Marcus, an independent insurance producer, recently purchased a list of prospect email addresses from a third-party vendor. He drafts a promotional message advertising new annuity products and schedules a mass digital delivery. Under the federal CAN-SPAM Act, which of the following actions regarding this email campaign would constitute a direct statutory violation? (Select all that apply.)
- Routing information in the sender field is intentionally masked to appear as a generic administrative alert rather than identifying Marcus as the true sender.Cevap
- The embedded link provided for recipients to unsubscribe from future communications expires and becomes non-functional 20 days after the initial transmission.Cevap
- CMarcus transmits the commercial solicitation without verifying whether the email addresses belong to consumers listed on the National Do Not Call Registry.
- DThe email fails to include a disclosure stating that adverse underwriting decisions may be based on the recipient's consumer credit report.
Cevap
The violations are intentionally masking the sender's routing information and allowing the unsubscribe link to expire 20 days after transmission.
The CAN-SPAM Act establishes clear boundaries for commercial email: senders cannot use false or misleading header information (masking the sender's identity), and the required opt-out mechanism must remain active for at least 30 days after the message is transmitted.
Adım Adım Çözüm
Anahtar Kavram
CAN-SPAM Act