A specialized risk evaluator at a life insurance carrier is cross-referencing a newly submitted application with external data sources. The applicant indicated no history of cardiovascular disease on the medical questionnaire. However, the Medical Information Bureau (MIB) database reveals a code for a recent heart-related treatment. To comply with industry regulations, how must the evaluator proceed to resolve this conflicting information?
- Order an Attending Physician's Statement (APS) to independently verify the applicant's clinical history, as adverse decisions cannot be based solely on MIB reports.Cevap
- BVoid the application immediately, since the applicant's health statements are considered warranties that guarantee absolute historical accuracy.
- CInstruct the producer to unilaterally amend the medical questionnaire on the original application to match the MIB records.
- DCategorize the applicant's dishonesty as a physical hazard and issue a formal denial letter based exclusively on the MIB data.
Cevap
The insurer must order an Attending Physician's Statement (APS) to independently verify the medical history because adverse underwriting decisions cannot be based exclusively on MIB findings.
The correct action is to obtain an Attending Physician's Statement (APS). The MIB serves to alert insurers to potential discrepancies, but industry rules mandate that MIB findings cannot be the sole basis for declining a risk or charging a higher premium. The insurer must independently verify the medical history.
Adım Adım Çözüm
Anahtar Kavram
The Medical Information Bureau (MIB) is an alert system for underwriters, but its reports cannot be used as the sole basis to decline an applicant or increase premiums; independent verification (like an APS) is mandatory.
Tahmini Süre:1m 15s