An actuarial firm is consulting for a life insurer that currently underwrites policies for a highly specialized risk pool of 800 commercial airline pilots. Seeking to leverage the Law of Large Numbers to achieve more stable and mathematically predictable aggregate loss ratios, the insurer's management proposes a rapid expansion: immediately absorbing a pre-existing block of 150,000 individuals who engage in diverse, high-hazard occupations—such as deep-sea welding, professional auto racing, and offshore drilling—into the pilot risk pool, while applying a single, uniform premium rate across the entire combined group.
Based on core insurance principles, which of the following best explains why this specific expansion strategy fails to properly utilize the Law of Large Numbers?
- AThe strategy erroneously attempts to apply statistical probability to speculative risks, because incorporating high-hazard occupations introduces scenarios where the insureds could potentially experience either financial gain or loss.
- BBy consolidating such a massive and diverse volume of exposures under a single rate, the insurer effectively forces the policyholders into a risk retention arrangement rather than a legally valid risk transfer.
- CThe Law of Large Numbers dictates that when a primary insurer aggregates disparate hazard classes, the predictive stability is entirely transferred to the assuming reinsurer, rendering the primary insurer's ratemaking process irrelevant.
- Although the total volume of exposure units drastically increases, the combined group lacks homogeneity; accurate statistical prediction requires a large number of units with similar risk profiles to ensure adequate rate setting.Cevap