Soru

Zorluk: ZorPerils and Hazards

A commercial property policyholder is disputing the findings of a liability claim investigation following a customer's slip-and-fall injury in their retail store. The investigation revealed the following facts:

1. A leaking display refrigerator had created a large puddle on the tile floor.
2. The store manager noticed the leak hours earlier but ignored it, stating they had excellent liability insurance to handle any accidents.
3. The customer slipped on this puddle and struck the ground, causing severe injury.
4. The store owner later submitted intentionally altered security footage to manipulate the timeline of the incident.

Based on standard insurance principles regarding risk, which of the following statements correctly classify the elements in this scenario? (Select all that apply)

  1. The puddle of water resulting from the leaking refrigerator constitutes a physical hazard.Cevap
  2. B
    The customer's act of slipping on the wet floor is classified as a physical hazard because it directly resulted in bodily injury.
  3. C
    The store manager's conscious decision to ignore the known leak because the store was insured represents a moral hazard.
  4. The store owner's submission of intentionally altered security footage to manipulate the claim is an example of a moral hazard.Cevap

Cevap

The correct classifications identify the puddle of water as a physical hazard and the submission of altered security footage as a moral hazard.
The correct statements accurately identify that a tangible condition (the puddle) is a physical hazard, and a deliberate fraudulent act (altering footage) is a moral hazard.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Evaluate the leaking refrigerator and resulting puddle.
Identified as a physical hazard.
It is a tangible, physical condition of the property that increases the probability of an accident.
2
Evaluate the customer slipping and striking the ground.
Identified as the peril.
Slipping is the active, direct cause of the injury and loss, rather than an underlying condition.
3
Evaluate the manager ignoring the leak due to reliance on insurance coverage.
Identified as a morale hazard.
This behavior demonstrates carelessness or indifference to a loss specifically because of the security provided by insurance.
4
Evaluate the owner submitting altered security footage.
Identified as a moral hazard.
This is a deliberate, dishonest act intended to defraud the insurance company and manipulate the claim.

Anahtar Kavram

Distinguishing between Perils (the direct cause of loss) and the three types of Hazards (Physical, Moral, and Morale) which are conditions that increase the chance or severity of a loss.
Bu soruyu puanla