An IT consulting firm operates a fleet of 50 company vehicles. After analyzing insurance costs, the risk manager determines that the premiums for physical damage coverage (comprehensive and collision) are disproportionately high given the aging fleet's actual cash value. The firm decides to drop all physical damage coverage. Instead, they deposit $30,000 annually into a dedicated, liquid reserve account to cover any future collision repairs or vehicle replacements, while continuing to purchase commercial auto liability insurance for third-party claims. Regarding the pure risk of physical damage to their vehicles, which method of handling risk has the firm primarily implemented?
- Risk retention, because the firm has consciously chosen to assume the financial responsibility for physical damage losses rather than purchasing insurance.Cevap
- BRisk reduction, because establishing a dedicated $30,000 reserve account decreases the physical severity of any future vehicle collisions.
- CRisk avoidance, because canceling the physical damage policies completely eliminates the peril of collision from the firm's daily operations.
- DRisk sharing, because the firm is taking a speculative risk that their $30,000 annual reserve will be more profitable than paying traditional insurance premiums.
Cevap
Risk retention, because the firm has consciously chosen to assume the financial responsibility for physical damage losses rather than purchasing insurance.
The correct answer accurately describes risk retention, often referred to as self-insurance in a commercial context. By choosing to drop their physical damage coverage and instead setting aside a dedicated reserve fund to pay for their own property losses, the firm has actively chosen to retain the financial consequences of that specific risk.
Adım Adım Çözüm
Anahtar Kavram
Risk Retention and Self-Insurance
Tahmini Süre:1m 30s