Oakwood Insurance provides a 1 million covered judgment, they discover Oakwood is experiencing administrative delays and attempt to file a claim directly with Global Re for $600,000. Under insurance principles, which of the following statements accurately identifies the type of reinsurance and the legal standing of the engineering firm's direct claim?
- Treaty reinsurance was utilized, and the engineering firm lacks the privity of contract required to collect directly from the reinsurer.Cevap
- BFacultative reinsurance was utilized, requiring the reinsurer to directly indemnify the engineering firm for its proportional share of the loss.
- CThis is a treaty reinsurance contract that legally designates the engineering firm as a third-party beneficiary with direct claim rights against the reinsurer.
- DThis scenario demonstrates risk avoidance by the primary insurer, which shifts the direct claims settlement obligation entirely to the reinsurer.
Cevap
The arrangement is a treaty reinsurance agreement, and because there is no privity of contract between the policyholder and the reinsurer, the engineering firm cannot file a claim directly against Global Re.
The scenario describes an automatic agreement for an entire class of policies, which defines treaty reinsurance. Furthermore, insurance law strictly holds that reinsurance is a contract between the primary insurer and the reinsurer. The original insured (the engineering firm) has no privity of contract with the reinsurer, meaning they have no legal right to demand payment directly from them.
Adım Adım Çözüm
Anahtar Kavram
Reinsurance Privity and Treaty Arrangements
Tahmini Süre:1m 0s