The British constitution is uncodified and derived from multiple sources, including Statute Law, Common Law, and Constitutional Conventions. In a situation where a long-standing principle of Common Law directly conflicts with a newly enacted Act of Parliament, which of the following best describes the constitutional outcome?
- The Act of Parliament (Statute Law) takes precedence and overrules the Common Law principle.Cevap
- BThe Common Law principle remains supreme as it forms the historical foundation of the UK legal system.
- CConstitutional Conventions are used as the primary legal authority to resolve conflicts between different sources of law.
- DThe Monarch must exercise the Royal Prerogative to decide which source of law is most appropriate for the case.
Cevap
The Act of Parliament (Statute Law) takes precedence and overrules the Common Law principle.
The correct answer is correct because the United Kingdom operates under the principle of parliamentary sovereignty. This means that Statute Law (Acts of Parliament) is the supreme source of law. If an Act of Parliament is passed that contradicts a principle of Common Law (laws developed by judges through history), the Act of Parliament takes precedence and becomes the new law.
Adım Adım Çözüm
Anahtar Kavram
Parliamentary Sovereignty and the Hierarchy of Constitutional Sources
Tahmini Süre:2m 0s