Although traditional legal theorists have dismissed customary community norms as too informal to serve as enforceable law, Professor Vance’s recent framework persuasively demonstrates that these unwritten codes frequently resolve property disputes with remarkable efficiency. Nonetheless, Vance overlooks the substantial risk of systemic bias inherent in non-codified adjudications, suggesting that while his model offers valuable insights, it cannot yet serve as a comprehensive substitute for statutory legal systems.
Which of the following best describes the author’s attitude toward Professor Vance’s framework?
- Auncritical enthusiasm
- Bdismissive skepticism
- qualified appreciationCevap
- Dvehement hostility
- Ecomplete indifference
Cevap
The author's attitude is best characterized as qualified appreciation.
The author explicitly describes Vance's framework as 'persuasively' demonstrating key points and offering 'valuable insights,' while simultaneously pointing out that Vance 'overlooks' systemic bias and cannot provide a 'comprehensive substitute.' This combination of endorsement and measured reservation constitutes qualified appreciation.
Adım Adım Çözüm
Anahtar Kavram
Author's Attitude and Tone
Tahmini Süre:50s