Read the following passage regarding legal positivism.
The jurisprudential framework of legal positivism, most notably articulated by H.L.A. Hart, fundamentally separates the existence of law from its moral qualities. Positivists assert that the legal validity of a rule depends solely on its pedigree—specifically, whether it was recognized and enacted through established institutional procedures. Therefore, under strict positivist theory, a deeply unjust statute remains completely legally valid provided it was formally codified. However, legal positivism is frequently misunderstood as demanding absolute obedience to all laws. While positivists insist that moral considerations do NOT determine a statute's legal validity, they readily concede that moral principles often influence the historical development of legal systems. Furthermore, positivists acknowledge that individuals may face profound moral obligations to disobey egregiously unjust laws; they simply maintain that such disobedience, while perhaps morally justified, remains a violation of the law itself.
Evaluate the accuracy of the following statement based on the passage:
Legal positivists concede that individuals might have a moral obligation to disobey egregiously unjust laws and that moral principles can influence the historical development of legal systems, but they do NOT acknowledge that a formally codified statute remains legally valid if it is deeply unjust.
Cevap: Cevap