Soru

Zorluk: OrtaSpecific Detail Inferences

Read the following passage carefully.

The aesthetic of "objective detachment" that dominated mid-twentieth-century American journalism was long heralded by its practitioners as a moral imperative, a commitment to presenting unvarnished facts free from authorial bias. Yet historians of media have increasingly recognized that this stylistic standard did not originate from a philosophical dedication to pure truth. Rather, it emerged as an economic byproduct of the nineteenth-century wire services. Because these syndicates relied on selling the same news reports to a multitude of local newspapers spanning a wide and often polarized political spectrum, any partisan coloration would have alienated potential subscribers. Thus, a flattened, strictly factual reporting style was adopted as a commercial necessity, ensuring maximum syndication.

By the 1960s, a cadre of writers known as the New Journalists began to aggressively dismantle this paradigm. Writers like Tom Wolfe, Truman Capote, and Joan Didion argued that the traditional mandate of objectivity was not merely an illusion, but a straitjacket that structurally prevented reporters from capturing the complex psychological and sociological realities of an era defined by profound cultural upheaval. To access these deeper truths, they appropriated the techniques of realist fiction: scene-by-scene construction, exhaustive detailing of status symbols, and the capturing of dialogue in its entirety.

However, the New Journalists were sharply divided on the role of the authorial voice. While Capote attempted to completely erase his own presence from his narratives, seeking to create a "nonfiction novel" that appeared to unfold autonomously, Didion explicitly foregrounded her own psychological state, operating on the premise that the observer's subjectivity is inextricably bound to the reality being observed.

The passage provides the most support for which of the following inferences regarding the "moral imperative" mentioned in the first paragraph?

  1. A
    It was a principle originally championed by nineteenth-century wire services to justify their economic strategy to politically polarized newspapers.
  2. B
    It was a universally accepted standard that successfully guaranteed that mid-twentieth-century journalism remained completely devoid of authorial bias.
  3. It functioned as a retrospective justification by mid-twentieth-century journalists for a stylistic convention that originally emerged from economic expediency.Cevap
  4. D
    It was an illusion that structurally prevented nineteenth-century wire services from capturing the complex psychological and sociological realities of their era.
  5. E
    It was a mandate fundamentally rejected by the New Journalists, who unanimously agreed that reporters must explicitly foreground their own subjectivity to reveal deeper truths.

Cevap

The correct answer is the option stating that it functioned as a retrospective justification by mid-twentieth-century journalists for a stylistic convention that originally emerged from economic expediency.
The correct answer accurately synthesizes the first paragraph's contrast between how mid-twentieth-century journalists viewed objective detachment (as a 'moral imperative') and its actual historical origin (an 'economic byproduct' of nineteenth-century syndication). It logically infers that the moral framing served as a later justification for a practice born entirely of commercial necessity.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Locate the phrase 'moral imperative' in the passage and identify its context.
The phrase is in the first paragraph. It describes how mid-twentieth-century journalists viewed the aesthetic of 'objective detachment.'
Specific detail inference questions require grounding the analysis in the exact textual reference provided in the stem.
2
Analyze the passage's claims regarding the origins and function of this concept.
The author contrasts this later moral justification with the historical reality: the objective style originated as an 'economic byproduct' to sell news to politically polarized audiences.
Inferences often require synthesizing a stated concept with contrasting context provided immediately after it.
3
Evaluate the answer choices to find the one that accurately reflects this historical shift.
The correct option captures that the moral framing was a later (retrospective) justification for a practice that began purely out of commercial necessity (economic expediency).
This option logically restates the textual facts without falling into absolute language or misattributing viewpoints.

Anahtar Kavram

Distinguishing the historical origins of a practice from how it was later justified or perceived by its practitioners.
Bu soruyu puanla