Examkin

Soru

Zorluk: OrtaTwo-Speaker Dialogues (Point at Issue)

Read the following dialogue.

Mayor: Offering tax incentives to attract remote workers will revitalize our local economy. These professionals spend a significant portion of their income on local dining and entertainment, which directly supports small businesses that are currently struggling.

Economist: While it is true that remote workers spend money locally, the proposed tax incentives would severely deplete the city's budget for public services. Because well-maintained public services are the primary factor that sustains a healthy local economy, implementing these incentives will actually hinder our economic revitalization.

Statement: Based on the dialogue, the Mayor and the Economist disagree over whether remote workers spend a significant portion of their income at local businesses.

Cevap: Cevap

Cevap

False. The statement incorrectly identifies the point at issue. The speakers do not disagree on this point; the Economist explicitly concedes that remote workers spend money locally.
The statement is false because the speakers actually agree on this proposition. The Mayor introduces the premise that remote workers spend money locally, and the Economist explicitly concedes this fact before introducing a counter-premise about depleted public services. Their actual disagreement centers on the overall impact of the tax incentives on the local economy.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Analyze the Mayor's argument to identify the conclusion and supporting premises.
Conclusion: Tax incentives for remote workers will revitalize the local economy. Premise: Remote workers spend a significant portion of their income locally.
Identifying the components of the first speaker's argument establishes the potential points of agreement or disagreement.
2
Analyze the Economist's argument to identify their stance on the Mayor's conclusion and premises.
Conclusion: Tax incentives will hinder economic revitalization. Premise: The incentives will deplete the budget for public services. Concession: It is true that remote workers spend money locally.
Understanding the second speaker's response reveals exactly where the two speakers' views diverge.
3
Evaluate the proposed statement against the identified stances of both speakers.
The statement claims they disagree about local spending. However, the Mayor asserts this is true, and the Economist explicitly agrees ('While it is true...'). Therefore, it is not a point of disagreement.
A valid point at issue requires one speaker to affirm a proposition and the other to deny it.

Anahtar Kavram

Two-Speaker Dialogues (Point at Issue)
Bu soruyu puanla

Konular

Two-Speaker Dialogues (Point at Issue)

Bu konudan daha fazla soru