Examkin

Soru

Zorluk: ZorDetermining Statement Roles

Sociologist: Some urban developers maintain that constructing large, centralized entertainment districts is the best strategy to revitalize declining downtown economies. While it is undeniable that these mega-projects initially generate significant construction employment, their long-term economic impact is largely illusory. After all, empirical data demonstrate that such centralized districts merely cannibalize existing local spending rather than attracting new external revenue. Thus, municipalities wishing to stimulate sustainable economic growth should abandon mega-projects and instead focus on providing micro-grants to distributed neighborhood businesses.

The claim that the long-term economic impact of centralized entertainment districts is largely illusory plays which one of the following roles in the sociologist's argument?

  1. It is an intermediate conclusion drawn to support the argument's ultimate policy recommendation.Cevap
  2. B
    It is the overall conclusion that the sociologist's argument is designed to establish.
  3. C
    It is a premise providing direct evidentiary support for the claim that centralized districts cannibalize local spending.
  4. D
    It is a viewpoint advanced by some urban developers that the sociologist ultimately attempts to refute.
  5. E
    It is a concession made to acknowledge a potential benefit of constructing large entertainment districts.

Cevap

The statement acts as an intermediate conclusion that bridges the empirical evidence to the final policy recommendation.
The correct answer accurately identifies the dual logical role of the target statement. First, it functions as a conclusion because it is supported by a premise (the empirical data showing that districts merely cannibalize existing spending). Second, it functions as an intermediate (or subsidiary) conclusion because it is subsequently used as a premise to support the author's final prescriptive conclusion that municipalities should focus on micro-grants instead.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Identify the main conclusion of the argument.
The main conclusion is found in the final sentence: municipalities should abandon mega-projects and instead focus on providing micro-grants.
Locating the main conclusion first establishes the endpoint toward which all other argumentative components flow.
2
Analyze the structural role of the target statement.
The target statement (long-term economic impact is largely illusory) is directly supported by the subsequent sentence regarding empirical data on cannibalized spending.
Understanding what supports the target statement helps determine if it functions as a premise or a conclusion.
3
Determine the target statement's relationship to the main conclusion.
The target statement acts as a reason for why municipalities should abandon mega-projects, making it a subsidiary or intermediate conclusion.
A claim that is both supported by premises and used to support the main conclusion is by definition an intermediate conclusion.

Anahtar Kavram

Identifying Intermediate Conclusions in Complex Arguments
Bu soruyu puanla

Konular

Determining Statement Roles

Bu konudan daha fazla soru