Examkin

Soru

Zorluk: KolaySufficient Assumption

Highcrest Nature Reserve contains several designated wetland habitats. Furthermore, any nature reserve that provides nesting grounds for migratory waterfowl is eligible for regional conservation grants. Therefore, Highcrest Nature Reserve is eligible for regional conservation grants.

The conclusion drawn above follows logically if which one of the following is assumed?

  1. A
    Any nature reserve that provides nesting grounds for migratory waterfowl contains designated wetland habitats.
  2. B
    Some nature reserves that contain designated wetland habitats provide nesting grounds for migratory waterfowl.
  3. Any nature reserve that contains designated wetland habitats provides nesting grounds for migratory waterfowl.Cevap
  4. D
    Regional conservation grants are awarded only to nature reserves that contain designated wetland habitats.
  5. E
    Every nature reserve eligible for regional conservation grants successfully preserves its migratory waterfowl population.

Cevap

The statement that any nature reserve containing designated wetland habitats provides nesting grounds for migratory waterfowl logically completes the argument.
The correct answer provides the precise universal conditional bridge needed: Designated Wetlands -> Nesting Grounds. Combining this with the fact that Highcrest has designated wetlands leads to the conclusion that Highcrest provides nesting grounds, which in turn triggers the premise guaranteeing eligibility for regional conservation grants.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Break down the premises and conclusion into conditional components
Premise 1: Highcrest contains designated wetland habitats. Premise 2: Nesting grounds for migratory waterfowl implies eligibility for regional conservation grants. Conclusion: Highcrest is eligible for regional conservation grants.
Deconstructing the argument isolates the stated facts from the ultimate claim.
2
Identify the missing link in the chain of reasoning
The premises connect Nesting Grounds to Grants, but we only know Highcrest has Wetlands. The missing link is: Designated wetland habitats guarantee nesting grounds for migratory waterfowl.
A sufficient assumption must establish a 100% deductive bridge between the rogue premise term and the sufficient condition of the rule.
3
Select the option that supplies the exact missing conditional statement
Assuming that any nature reserve containing designated wetland habitats provides nesting grounds completes the syllogism: Highcrest -> Wetland -> Nesting Grounds -> Eligible for Grants.
This guarantees the truth of the conclusion with absolute certainty.

Anahtar Kavram

Sufficient Assumption Conditional Bridging
Tahmini Süre:45s
Bu soruyu puanla

Konular

Sufficient Assumption

Bu konudan daha fazla soru