Examkin

Soru

Zorluk: OrtaCircular Reasoning (Begging the Question)

Political Theorist: A truly democratic government must guarantee unconditional freedom of expression for all its citizens. We can be certain of this, because any system of governance that places limits on what people are allowed to say cannot genuinely be considered a democracy.

Which one of the following most accurately describes a flaw in the political theorist's argument?

  1. A
    treats a condition that is necessary for a government to be considered democratic as if it were sufficient to guarantee a democratic government
  2. B
    relies on an ambiguous use of the key term "democracy" throughout the argument
  3. attempts to support its conclusion simply by restating that conclusion in slightly different termsCevap
  4. D
    takes for granted that the presence of unconditional freedom of expression is the cause of a democratic government, rather than merely a characteristic of it
  5. E
    treats contextual background information about different systems of governance as a logical premise that actively supports the conclusion

Cevap

The correct answer is the option indicating that the argument attempts to support its conclusion simply by restating that conclusion in slightly different terms.
The argument's conclusion states that a democracy requires freedom of expression. Its only premise states that without freedom of expression, a system is not a democracy. These two statements mean exactly the same thing. Therefore, the argument provides no independent evidence and merely restates its conclusion to prove itself.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Identify the main conclusion of the argument.
The conclusion is the first sentence: A truly democratic government must guarantee unconditional freedom of expression.
This is the primary claim the theorist is attempting to establish, and the rest of the passage is structured to justify it.
2
Identify the premises provided to support the conclusion.
The only supporting premise is: "any system of governance that places limits on what people are allowed to say cannot genuinely be considered a democracy."
The word "because" explicitly marks this statement as the evidence provided for the conclusion.
3
Analyze the logical relationship between the premise and the conclusion.
The premise states: If limits on speech exist -> not a democracy. The conclusion states: If a democracy exists -> no limits on speech.
These two conditional statements are contrapositives of each other, meaning they express the exact same logical relationship.
4
Determine the structural flaw resulting from this relationship.
The argument provides no independent evidence; it uses the conclusion itself (just phrased as its contrapositive) as the only premise.
Using a claim to prove itself is the definition of circular reasoning.

Anahtar Kavram

Circular reasoning (begging the question) occurs when an argument's conclusion is used as one of its premises, or when the premise simply restates the conclusion in different words, thereby providing no independent logical support.
Bu soruyu puanla

Konular

Circular Reasoning (Begging the Question)

Bu konudan daha fazla soru