Carefully analyze the argument below.
In evolutionary biology, morphological convergence is typically cited as evidence that specific environmental pressures deterministically sculpt species into optimal physiological forms. However, this adaptationist paradigm severely underestimates the constraints of phylogenetic inertia. Because complex organisms possess highly integrated developmental pathways, a genetic lineage can produce only a narrowly circumscribed range of viable mutations. Consequently, morphological similarities between distinct clades frequently reflect shared developmental limitations rather than independent optimization to identical environments. It follows that the presence of analogous structures in disparate species should not be reflexively construed as proof of identical selective pressures. The fundamental architecture of an organism is dictated more strictly by its ancestral developmental blueprint than by its immediate ecological context.
Identify the ultimate main conclusion of the argument. Copy and paste the exact sentence from the passage that functions as the main point.
Cevap: The fundamental architecture of an organism is dictated more strictly by its ancestral developmental blueprint than by its immediate ecological context. / The fundamental architecture of an organism is dictated more strictly by its ancestral developmental blueprint than by its immediate ecological context / the fundamental architecture of an organism is dictated more strictly by its ancestral developmental blueprint than by its immediate ecological context. / the fundamental architecture of an organism is dictated more strictly by its ancestral developmental blueprint than by its immediate ecological context