Examkin

Soru

Zorluk: OrtaSufficient Assumption

Match each incomplete deductive argument with the corresponding bridge assumption that, if assumed, enables the argument's conclusion to follow logically from its premises.

  • Argument 1 (Paleoceanography):
    Premise: Core samples from the Weddell Sea contain elevated concentrations of terrigenous quartz silt deposited during the mid-Pliocene epoch.
    Premise: Any sedimentary deposit containing terrigenous quartz silt in that region was transported exclusively by expanded sub-ice shelf meltwater currents.
    Conclusion: Therefore, mid-Pliocene sea-surface temperatures in the Weddell Sea were at least 3∘C3^\circ\text{C} warmer than present-day levels.    Any expansion of sub-ice shelf meltwater currents capable of transporting sedimentary silt requires regional sea-surface temperatures to be at least 3∘C3^\circ\text{C} warmer than present-day levels.
  • Argument 2 (Epigraphy):
    Premise: The Linear C inscriptions discovered at the Kourion sanctuary site contain non-repetitive numeric tally marks aligned with lunar cycle intervals.
    Premise: Any archaeological text containing numeric tallies synchronized to celestial intervals served as an administrative calendar for civic harvest taxation.
    Conclusion: Therefore, the Linear C inscriptions represent an official legal decree rather than personal devotional graffiti.    Every ancient administrative calendar utilized for civic harvest taxation is an official legal decree rather than personal devotional graffiti.
  • Argument 3 (Pharmacology):
    Premise: The experimental kinase inhibitor compound ZT-409 suppresses cardiac microvascular pericyte proliferation in in-vitro human assays.
    Premise: Any pharmacological compound that inhibits cardiac pericyte proliferation inevitably degrades ventricular contractile compliance in live mammalian tissue.
    Conclusion: Therefore, Phase III human clinical trials for ZT-409 ought to be immediately suspended by regulatory oversight boards.    Any experimental drug whose administration inevitably degrades ventricular contractile compliance in live mammalian tissue ought to have its Phase III clinical trials immediately suspended by regulatory oversight boards.

Cevap

Argument 1 matches with the assumption linking meltwater currents to temperatures at least 3∘C3^\circ\text{C} warmer; Argument 2 matches with the assumption linking administrative harvest taxation calendars to official legal decrees; Argument 3 matches with the assumption linking ventricular contractile degradation to mandatory Phase III trial suspension.
Each matched pair supplies the exact conditional premise required to make the conclusion follow inescapably from the stated premises. In Argument 1, the premise chain established meltwater currents; assuming that meltwater transport requires temperatures at least 3∘C3^\circ\text{C} warmer guarantees the temperature conclusion. In Argument 2, the premises established that the text is an administrative harvest calendar; assuming all such calendars are official legal decrees guarantees the legal decree conclusion. In Argument 3, the premises established ventricular compliance degradation; assuming that such degradation mandates immediate clinical trial suspension guarantees the regulatory suspension conclusion.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Analyze each argument's premise chain and identify the unlinked term in its conclusion.
Found the exact inferential gaps: Argument 1 needs a link between meltwater transport and temperature rise; Argument 2 needs a link between harvest taxation calendars and official legal decrees; Argument 3 needs a link between ventricular compliance degradation and clinical trial suspension.
A sufficient assumption must bridge the gap between the existing premises and the conclusion so that the conclusion is deductively guaranteed.
2
Formulate the required conditional statement (A→BA \rightarrow B) for each scenario.
Formulated: (1) Meltwater Transport →\rightarrow Temperature ≥3∘C\ge 3^\circ\text{C} Warmer; (2) Harvest Taxation Calendar →\rightarrow Official Legal Decree; (3) Ventricular Compliance Degradation →\rightarrow Suspend Phase III Trials.
Conditional bridges ensure complete logical sufficiency without allowing counterexamples.
3
Match each argument on the left to its exact corresponding conditional bridge on the right.
Successfully paired Argument 1 with the temperature bridge, Argument 2 with the legal decree bridge, and Argument 3 with the clinical trial suspension bridge.
Each right-hand statement supplies the precise premise needed to complete the deductive syllogism of its respective left-hand argument.

Anahtar Kavram

Sufficient Assumption Identification in Deductive Syllogisms
Tahmini Süre:1m 30s
Bu soruyu puanla

Konular

Sufficient Assumption

Bu konudan daha fazla soru