Read the following passage:
Traditional historians have long argued that the early industrial revolution was primarily driven by major technological innovations, most notably the steam engine. In contrast, recent economic historians emphasize the role of evolving institutional frameworks. They claim that the establishment of robust property rights and patent laws provided the essential financial incentives that motivated early inventors. Meanwhile, environmental historian Sarah Jenkins takes a notably different approach. She contends that the widespread availability of cheap, accessible coal was the foundational catalyst for industrialization, asserting that without this abundant energy source, the aforementioned technological and institutional developments would have been largely irrelevant.
According to the passage, Sarah Jenkins asserts which of the following regarding the industrial revolution?
- AIt was fundamentally caused by the invention of the steam engine and other major technological innovations.
- BIt was primarily stimulated by the establishment of robust property rights and patent laws.
- CIts primary historical significance lies in how it changed the institutional frameworks that governed inventors.
- Its emergence was critically dependent on the accessibility of an inexpensive and abundant energy source.Cevap
- EIt would have occurred independently of technological innovations as long as financial incentives were actively enforced.