Conservationist: The Azure Warbler relies exclusively on the Silver Birch tree for nesting. Over the last decade, a fungal disease has destroyed roughly 30 percent of the Silver Birch trees in the regional park. Because of this significant loss of nesting habitats, the population of Azure Warblers in the park will inevitably decline over the next few years.
Which one of the following is an assumption on which the conservationist's argument depends?
- AAll of the Silver Birch trees that were destroyed by the disease contained Azure Warbler nests.
- BThe regional park contains no other tree species that could be affected by the same fungal disease.
- The remaining Silver Birch trees in the park do not provide enough nesting capacity to support the current population of Azure Warblers.Cevap
- DThe fungal disease that killed the Silver Birch trees is also directly harmful to the health of the Azure Warblers.
- EAny decrease in the availability of nesting sites will inevitably lead to a decline in the population of any bird species.
Cevap
The correct answer is the option stating that the remaining Silver Birch trees in the park do not provide enough nesting capacity to support the current population of Azure Warblers.
The correct answer identifies the core assumption bridging the gap between the loss of trees and the decline of the bird population. For the argument to hold, it must be true that the park did not previously have a massive surplus of Silver Birch trees. If the remaining 70 percent of the trees are still sufficient to comfortably accommodate all the Azure Warblers, then the population would not inevitably decline. By negating this option ('The remaining trees DO provide enough capacity'), the conclusion is completely undermined, proving this assumption is strictly necessary.
Adım Adım Çözüm
Anahtar Kavram
Necessary Assumption and the Negation Test