Examkin

Soru

Zorluk: KolayEquivocation (Uncertain Use of a Term)

City Council Member: The citizens of our town have been protesting, demanding greater transparency in local government operations. In response to these demands, we have installed large glass windows in all the committee meeting rooms at City Hall. Since our meeting rooms now have absolute transparency, we have fully satisfied the citizens' demands.

The council member's reasoning is most vulnerable to criticism on the grounds that the argument:

  1. relies on two distinct meanings of the word 'transparency' to draw its conclusion.Cevap
  2. B
    takes for granted that installing glass windows was the only possible way to appease the protesters.
  3. C
    assumes without justification that the citizens' demands for government operational changes were reasonable in the first place.
  4. D
    confuses a claim about the whole of local government with a claim about specific committee meeting rooms.
  5. E
    fails to establish that the protests were the actual cause of the renovations to City Hall.

Cevap

The correct answer is the option stating that the argument relies on two distinct meanings of the word 'transparency'.
The argument is flawed because it treats the physical transparency of the glass windows as if it fulfills the citizens' demand for political transparency. This is a classic equivocation flaw, where the same word is used in two completely different senses to falsely link a premise to a conclusion.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Identify the conclusion of the argument.
The conclusion is: 'we have fully satisfied the citizens' demands.'
This is the main claim the council member is trying to prove.
2
Identify the premises supporting this conclusion.
Premise 1: Citizens demanded greater transparency in government operations. Premise 2: The city installed glass windows to provide absolute transparency in meeting rooms.
Understanding the evidence is necessary to see how the author attempts to justify the conclusion.
3
Evaluate the relationship between the premises and the conclusion to locate the logical gap.
The citizens demanded 'transparency' in the sense of political openness and accountability. The council member provided 'transparency' in the literal, physical sense (glass windows).
Identifying this disconnect reveals the structural flaw in the reasoning.
4
Match the logical gap to the correct flaw description in the options.
The gap is an illicit shift in the meaning of a key term, which matches the option describing reliance on two distinct meanings of the word 'transparency'.
This directly answers the question stem asking for the argument's vulnerability.

Anahtar Kavram

Equivocation (Uncertain Use of a Term)
Bu soruyu puanla

Konular

Equivocation (Uncertain Use of a Term)

Bu konudan daha fazla soru