Every painting acquired by the city museum before 1900 is considered part of the permanent collection. Therefore, every painting acquired by the museum before 1900 must be displayed on the first floor of the building.
Which one of the following, if assumed, enables the argument's conclusion to be properly drawn?
- AEvery painting displayed on the first floor of the building is part of the permanent collection.
- Every painting that is part of the permanent collection must be displayed on the first floor of the building.Cevap
- CAny painting not considered part of the permanent collection must not be displayed on the first floor of the building.
- DMost paintings that are considered part of the permanent collection must be displayed on the first floor of the building.
- EPaintings in the permanent collection are generally more valuable and thus require the security features found on the first floor.
Cevap
The correct assumption is that every painting that is part of the permanent collection must be displayed on the first floor of the building.
The argument provides the premise (A -> B) and draws the conclusion (A -> C). To make this logically valid, we must bridge the gap between B and C with the rule (B -> C). The correct answer explicitly provides this missing rule: if a painting is in the permanent collection, it must be displayed on the first floor.
Adım Adım Çözüm
Anahtar Kavram
Sufficient Assumption conditional chaining