Legal scholar H. L. A. Hart famously posited that a legal system requires both primary rules of obligation—which dictate basic societal conduct—and secondary rules, which specify how those primary rules are recognized, changed, and adjudicated. While earlier legal positivist thinkers viewed law merely as coercive commands backed by the threat of force from a sovereign, Hart demonstrated that such a view fails to account for the systematic continuity of legal authority and the internal attitude of acceptance that officials and citizens exhibit toward legal standards. By introducing the union of primary and secondary rules, Hart successfully reoriented modern jurisprudence away from simple command models toward a structural framework that explains how legal systems maintain institutional validity and legitimacy.
Based on the passage, what is the author's primary purpose?
Cevap: to explain how Hart's theory of primary and secondary rules improved upon earlier command theories of law / to explain Hart's theory of primary and secondary rules / to describe Hart's contribution to modern jurisprudence over command theories / explaining Hart's structural framework of legal rules / to show how Hart redefined legal systems using primary and secondary rules / to explain how Hart advanced legal positivism beyond simple command models