For each argumentative exchange provided below, identify the specific method of refutation employed by the respondent. Match each dialogue with the correct abstract description of how its counterexample functions logically.
- Economist: Raising interest rates inevitably leads to a rapid decline in consumer spending.
Historian: That absolute rule is incorrect. In the early 1980s, despite unprecedented interest rate hikes, consumer spending actually rose significantly.Cites a specific instance where a purported cause is present, but its supposed inevitable effect fails to occur. - Biologist: In order for any animal species to survive in the extreme depths of the ocean, it must possess bioluminescent capabilities.
Marine Explorer: The giant tube worm thrives at deep-sea thermal vents, yet it entirely lacks any form of bioluminescence.Identifies a case where a condition claimed to be strictly necessary for a given phenomenon is absent, yet the phenomenon still occurs. - Urban Planner: Implementing massive highway expansion projects will successfully reduce metropolitan traffic congestion.
Traffic Engineer: Following the expansion of the western interstate to twelve lanes, average commute times actually increased.Demonstrates through a specific case that a proposed intervention brings about the exact opposite of its intended result. - Art Critic: No single painting can be considered both hyper-realistic and purely abstract; these two aesthetic modes are fundamentally contradictory.
Curator: Chuck Close's later large-scale portraits appear as highly abstract grids of color up close, yet perfectly hyper-realistic from a distance.Provides an example establishing that two characteristics asserted to be mutually exclusive can in fact coexist within a single entity.
Cevap
The economist's dialogue matches the 'cause without effect' description. The biologist's dialogue matches the 'phenomenon without necessary condition' description. The urban planner's dialogue matches the 'intervention causing opposite result' description. The art critic's dialogue matches the 'coexistence of mutually exclusive traits' description.
Each correct match successfully translates the concrete details of the respondent's counterexample into abstract logical terminology. A counterexample's functional role is dictated entirely by the precise architecture of the universal claim it targets.
Adım Adım Çözüm
Anahtar Kavram
Abstracting the Logical Function of Counterexamples
Tahmini Süre:1m 30s