Soru

Zorluk: OrtaArgument by Elimination

Agricultural scientists are investigating the sudden, widespread failure of the Azure Melon crop in the northern valley. They initially considered four potential causes before systematically ruling them out to isolate the true factor. Match each proposed hypothesis for the crop failure with the specific piece of evidence that was used to logically eliminate it from consideration.

  • The crop failed due to a novel viral pathogen.Extensive molecular screening of the affected cellular tissue failed to detect any traces of exogenous RNA or DNA.
  • The failure resulted from severe soil nutrient depletion.Biochemical assays of the earth surrounding the roots confirmed robust concentrations of essential growth elements, including nitrogen and phosphorus.
  • A widespread fungal root rot caused the crops to wither.Botanical surveys of the subterranean agricultural beds revealed completely intact vascular systems and no sign of tissue necrosis.
  • Unprecedented drought conditions prevented the melons from maturing.Comprehensive environmental data indicated that precipitation during the vulnerable growth phase exceeded historical decadal averages.

Cevap

Viral pathogen matches the absence of exogenous genetic material; soil depletion matches the robust nutrient assays; fungal root rot matches the intact subterranean vascular systems; and drought matches the above-average precipitation data.
In an argument by elimination, competing hypotheses are systematically ruled out by introducing specific premises that contradict a necessary condition of each hypothesis. Each correct pair perfectly matches a hypothesis with the unique piece of evidence that logically falsifies it.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Analyze the 'viral pathogen' hypothesis to identify its necessary conditions.
It requires the presence of a virus, which would leave foreign genetic material in the plant cells.
By identifying a necessary condition, we can find the specific evidence that falsifies it.
2
Analyze the 'soil nutrient depletion' hypothesis.
It requires the soil to lack essential elements for plant growth.
Finding evidence of robust concentrations of nitrogen and phosphorus directly refutes this requirement.
3
Analyze the 'fungal root rot' hypothesis.
It requires damage or decay to the root structure.
Evidence showing completely intact subterranean vascular systems eliminates this possibility.
4
Analyze the 'drought' hypothesis.
It requires a severe shortage of water during the growing season.
Data confirming precipitation exceeded historical averages directly contradicts a drought.

Anahtar Kavram

Argument by Elimination
Bu soruyu puanla