Examkin

Soru

Zorluk: OrtaResolve the Paradox

In an agricultural province, farmers recently adopted an advanced drip-irrigation technology engineered to reduce water loss from evaporation and soil runoff by forty percent per acre. Over the past three years, this technology was implemented across nearly all farms in the region. However, hydrological records show that the total volume of groundwater pumped from the region's shared aquifer for agricultural use increased substantially over those same three years, even though regional rainfall levels and the total acreage of cultivated farmland remained constant.

Which of the following, if true, most helps to resolve the apparent discrepancy described above?

  1. A
    Government grants and agricultural subsidies covered most of the upfront purchase and installation costs of the new drip-irrigation equipment for local farmers.
  2. B
    The newly installed drip-irrigation systems feature automated soil sensors that shut off water delivery completely during unseasonable rainfall or high humidity.
  3. The increased water efficiency and lower per-acre operating costs prompted many farmers to replace drought-resistant grain crops with lucrative specialty fruits that require far more water per plant.Cevap
  4. D
    A severe multi-year meteorological drought significantly decreased the total amount of precipitation received by agricultural land across the province during the three-year period.
  5. E
    All conventional spray irrigation systems formerly utilized in the province consistently lost more than half of their distributed water to surface runoff.

Cevap

The choice explaining that lower per-acre operating costs prompted farmers to switch to more water-intensive specialty crops.
The correct statement successfully bridges the two facts by introducing a shift in agricultural crop choice. While the irrigation hardware wastes 40% less water per acre, farmers responded to the lower marginal cost and precise water delivery by planting specialty fruit crops that consume substantially more total water than the previous drought-resistant grains. This allows per-acre efficiency to improve while total water extraction simultaneously increases across identical total acreage.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Identify the two seemingly contradictory facts in the stimulus.
Fact 1: Drip irrigation reduced water loss per acre by 40% with total acreage and rainfall remaining unchanged. Fact 2: Total groundwater extracted from the aquifer increased substantially.
Resolving a paradox requires isolating the specific tension between the premises without assuming an unstated conclusion.
2
Determine the necessary bridging mechanism.
A valid explanation must show how more efficient per-acre irrigation can lead to higher aggregate water extraction across the same total land area.
The correct answer must allow both facts to be simultaneously true without rejecting either premise.
3
Evaluate the answer choices against the required mechanism.
The statement regarding farmers switching from low-water grains to highly water-intensive fruit crops provides a direct compensatory mechanism that accounts for higher total extraction.
If the water requirements per acre rose drastically due to new crop selection, total water pumped can rise even when the delivery system itself is 40% less wasteful.

Anahtar Kavram

Reconciling an efficiency rebound effect where technological efficiency gains induce behavioral changes that increase total consumption.
Tahmini Süre:1m 20s
Bu soruyu puanla

Konular

Resolve the Paradox

Bu konudan daha fazla soru