Examkin

Soru

Zorluk: OrtaExplicit Main Point Identification

The legendary account of the first screening of the Lumière brothers' *L'Arrivée d'un train en gare de La Ciotat* in 1895 holds that audiences, terrified by the oncoming locomotive, fled the theater in a panic. For decades, this anecdote has been uncritically reproduced in film histories as definitive proof of the overwhelming, unprecedented realism of the new medium. According to this narrative, early spectators lacked the visual literacy to distinguish projected images from physical reality, making them uniquely susceptible to the illusion of the moving image.

However, archival research into the era's press clippings and police records yields no contemporary evidence of such a stampede. In reality, the myth of the panicking spectator was not a spontaneous historical occurrence, but rather a deliberate discursive construction synthesized years later by film promoters to validate cinema as a visceral, autonomous art form distinct from traditional theater. By cultivating the legend of a medium so powerful it could bypass rational thought, the nascent film industry successfully positioned the cinematic apparatus itself—rather than the mundane subjects it recorded—as the primary spectacle. Therefore, the terror of the first audiences tells us less about early cognitive responses to film than it does about the sophisticated marketing strategies necessary to institutionalize cinema.

Which one of the following most accurately expresses the main point of the passage?

  1. A
    Early film spectators lacked the visual literacy required to distinguish projected images from reality, making them uniquely susceptible to the illusion of the moving image.
  2. B
    Archival evidence from 1895, including police records and contemporary press clippings, contradicts the long-held belief that early filmgoers fled theaters in terror.
  3. C
    The history of early cinema has been fundamentally distorted by historians who fail to recognize the sophisticated marketing strategies that studios used to manipulate public perception.
  4. The widely repeated story of audiences panicking at a Lumière brothers' film is not a factual historical event, but a retroactive myth constructed by promoters to legitimize the cinematic medium.Cevap
  5. E
    To expose the historical inaccuracies surrounding the Lumière brothers' initial screenings and demonstrate that the cinematic apparatus was the primary spectacle of early film.

Cevap

The widely repeated story of audiences panicking at a Lumière brothers' film is not a factual historical event, but a retroactive myth constructed by promoters to legitimize the cinematic medium.
This option accurately captures the author's overarching thesis, located in the second paragraph. The author explicitly argues that the anecdote of the fleeing audience is a 'deliberate discursive construction' created by promoters to 'validate cinema' rather than an actual historical event demonstrating visual illiteracy.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Identify the topic and the primary debate.
The passage discusses the famous anecdote of audiences fleeing a Lumière brothers' film, contrasting the traditional historical belief with new archival evidence.
Understanding the subject matter and the conflict is the first step in reading comprehension.
2
Locate the author's explicit thesis.
The thesis is found in the second paragraph: 'the myth of the panicking spectator was not a spontaneous historical occurrence, but rather a deliberate discursive construction synthesized years later by film promoters to validate cinema'.
Explicit main point questions require finding the exact sentence where the author states their central, unifying claim.
3
Evaluate the options against the explicit thesis.
The correct option captures the claim that the panic story is an invented marketing myth meant to validate cinema, rather than a historical fact of audience illiteracy.
Matching the explicit thesis to the answer choices ensures the selected option captures the overall argument without being too broad, too narrow, or confusing the main point with the passage's purpose.

Anahtar Kavram

Explicit Main Point Identification
Bu soruyu puanla

Konular

Explicit Main Point Identification

Bu konudan daha fazla soru