Archaeologist: Recent excavations of the ancient settlement of Tlanex indicate a stark division in material culture. The highland sector contains thousands of intricately carved jade artifacts, whereas the lowland sector contains almost exclusively unpolished clay implements. Because the jade artifacts required hundreds of hours of specialized labor to produce, they were undoubtedly luxury items of immense value. Consequently, the inhabitants of the highland sector must have belonged to a significantly higher socioeconomic class than the inhabitants of the lowland sector.
Which one of the following is an assumption required by the archaeologist's argument?
- The artifacts recovered from the highland and lowland sectors were not deposited by a single population that utilized the two sectors for different societal functions.Cevap
- BAnyone in Tlanex who possessed intricately carved jade artifacts belonged to a higher socioeconomic class than anyone who possessed only unpolished clay implements.
- CAll of the intricately carved jade artifacts produced in Tlanex were kept within the highland sector rather than traded to other ancient settlements.
- DThe unpolished clay implements found in the lowland sector were not primarily used for the manufacturing or transportation of the intricately carved jade artifacts.
- EThe immense value of the intricately carved jade artifacts was the primary cause of the socioeconomic disparity between the inhabitants of the two sectors.
Cevap
The argument requires assuming that the artifacts recovered from the highland and lowland sectors were not deposited by a single population that utilized the two sectors for different societal functions.
To test if an assumption is necessary, we apply the Negation Technique: we make the statement false and see if the argument survives. If we negate the correct answer, it becomes: 'The artifacts recovered from the highland and lowland sectors WERE deposited by a single population that utilized the two sectors for different societal functions.' If the exact same group of people simply used the highland sector for one thing (e.g., storing wealth or ceremonies) and the lowland sector for another (e.g., farming or daily work), then there are no distinct 'inhabitants of the highland sector' to compare against 'inhabitants of the lowland sector.' Because negating this statement completely destroys the argument, the original statement is a logically necessary assumption.
Adım Adım Çözüm
Anahtar Kavram
Defender Assumption / Negation Technique