Financial analyst: To boost our country's stagnant national savings rate, lawmakers have proposed replacing the current flat income tax with a comprehensive consumption tax. Because a consumption tax applies only to money spent on goods and services, rather than on money earned, citizens will be heavily incentivized to save a larger portion of their income to minimize their tax burden. Consequently, transitioning to this consumption tax system will successfully alleviate the national savings crisis without causing a decline in overall government tax revenue.
Which of the following statements are necessary assumptions upon which the financial analyst's argument depends? (Select all that apply)
- The anticipated reduction in citizen spending on goods and services will not precipitate an economic downturn that ultimately lowers the national savings rate.Cevap
- BThe majority of citizens currently paying the flat income tax possess enough disposable income to significantly increase their savings.
- The total tax revenue generated by the new consumption tax will be at least equal to the revenue currently generated by the flat income tax.Cevap
- DTransitioning to a comprehensive consumption tax is the most effective policy available for heavily incentivizing citizens to save their income.
- EThe government will utilize the revenue collected from the consumption tax to directly fund public initiatives that support economic stability.
Cevap
The argument necessarily assumes both that the reduction in spending will not cause a savings-destroying economic downturn, and that the new consumption tax will generate at least as much revenue as the old flat tax.
The correct options highlight required conditions for the argument's dual conclusion to hold true. The argument concludes that the new tax will successfully alleviate the national savings crisis without causing a decline in overall government tax revenue. First, if the anticipated reduction in spending precipitated an economic downturn that lowered the national savings rate, the crisis would not be alleviated. Second, if the total tax revenue generated by the new consumption tax were less than the current flat income tax revenue, there would be a decline in government tax revenue. Negating either of these statements causes a critical piece of the argument to collapse, proving they are necessary assumptions.
Adım Adım Çözüm
Anahtar Kavram
Identifying Necessary Assumptions using the Negation Technique on compound conclusions.