Examkin

Soru

Zorluk: Çok zorComparative Analogies

Read the following two excerpts outlining distinct theories from different academic disciplines:

Excerpt A
According to Thomas Kuhn, scientific progress is not purely cumulative. Instead, disciplines spend long periods in 'normal science,' operating under a universally accepted paradigm that dictates which problems are legitimate. Over time, anomalies—observations that the current paradigm cannot explain—accumulate. Initially ignored or dismissed, these anomalies eventually induce a profound crisis of confidence within the scientific community. This crisis is resolved only through a sudden, discontinuous 'paradigm shift,' wherein an entirely new theoretical framework abruptly overthrows and replaces the old, redefining the discipline's fundamental boundaries.

Excerpt B
The theory of punctuated equilibrium challenges the view of steady, gradual evolution. It posits that species spend the vast majority of their geological history in morphological stasis, exhibiting essentially no physical change. However, as localized ecological stresses silently build over time, a population's existing physiological traits become increasingly mismatched with its environment. This growing evolutionary friction reaches a critical threshold, often manifesting as a sudden environmental cataclysm. This triggers a rapid, explosive burst of speciation in isolated populations. Consequently, novel descendant species emerge abruptly in the fossil record, completely superseding their ancestors.

Based on the structural analogies between the two chronological models presented, match each conceptual element from Excerpt A with its precise logical counterpart in Excerpt B.

  • Periods of 'normal science'Morphological stasis
  • Accumulation of anomaliesGrowing mismatch from ecological stresses
  • Profound crisis of confidenceCritical threshold of environmental cataclysm
  • Discontinuous 'paradigm shift'Explosive burst of speciation
  • New theoretical frameworkNovel descendant species

Cevap

The structural analogies map as follows: 'Normal science' equates to 'Morphological stasis' (the baseline stability); 'Accumulation of anomalies' equates to 'Growing mismatch' (the building tension); 'Crisis of confidence' equates to 'Critical threshold' (the breaking point); 'Paradigm shift' equates to 'Burst of speciation' (the mechanism of change); and 'New theoretical framework' equates to 'Novel descendant species' (the resulting outcome).
Each matched pair plays the exact same functional and chronological role in their respective models. Both models describe a system defined by long periods of inertia (normal science / stasis), which are undermined by building internal friction (anomalies / stress mismatch). This tension inevitably peaks at an acute breaking point (crisis / cataclysm), forcing a sudden, transformative event (paradigm shift / speciation) that results in a completely new dominant state (new framework / descendant species).

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Analyze the overarching chronological structure shared by both excerpts.
Both excerpts describe a five-stage model: 1) Baseline stability, 2) Gradual accumulation of tension, 3) An acute breaking point, 4) A sudden mechanism of transition, and 5) A new stable outcome.
Identifying the shared macro-structure is required before mapping specific, micro-level concepts.
2
Isolate the baseline state in both passages.
In Excerpt A, the long period of stability is 'normal science'. In Excerpt B, it is 'morphological stasis'.
Establishing the starting point anchors the rest of the chronological analogy.
3
Distinguish the building tension from the acute trigger.
The 'accumulation of anomalies' (A) is the slow buildup matching 'growing mismatch from ecological stresses' (B). The resulting 'profound crisis of confidence' (A) is the acute trigger matching the 'critical threshold of environmental cataclysm' (B).
Conflating the underlying cause with the immediate trigger is a common error in structural reading comprehension.
4
Distinguish the action of transition from the final result.
The 'discontinuous paradigm shift' (A) is the active transition matching the 'explosive burst of speciation' (B). The 'new theoretical framework' (A) is the final static outcome matching the 'novel descendant species' (B).
Precise relational mapping requires separating verbs/processes from nouns/outcomes.

Anahtar Kavram

Relational Mapping and Structural Analogies
Tahmini Süre:3m 0s
Bu soruyu puanla

Konular

Comparative Analogies

Bu konudan daha fazla soru