Examkin

Soru

Zorluk: ZorNecessary Assumption

Financial Analyst: The manufacturing sector in Country X will likely experience a severe contraction this year. The global price of refined rhodium, a catalyst essential for the advanced electronics manufactured almost exclusively in Country X, has tripled in the past six months. Because manufacturers in Country X operate on very thin profit margins, they cannot absorb this cost increase without significantly raising their prices, an action that will inevitably cause a drastic drop in their sales volume.

Which one of the following is an assumption on which the financial analyst's argument depends?

  1. The production of advanced electronics accounts for a large enough proportion of Country X's manufacturing sector that a drastic drop in their sales would cause a severe contraction in the sector as a whole.Cevap
  2. B
    Country X's manufacturing sector produces no goods other than advanced electronics.
  3. C
    If the global price of refined rhodium had not tripled, Country X's manufacturing sector would not be facing a severe contraction this year.
  4. D
    Manufacturers of advanced electronics in other countries will not experience a similar increase in their raw material costs.
  5. E
    The drastic drop in sales volume will force the majority of advanced electronics manufacturers in Country X to permanently close their businesses.

Cevap

The production of advanced electronics accounts for a large enough proportion of Country X's manufacturing sector that a drastic drop in their sales would cause a severe contraction in the sector as a whole.
The argument commits a classic part-to-whole scope shift. The premises provide evidence that one specific industry—advanced electronics—will suffer a drastic drop in sales. However, the conclusion claims that the entire 'manufacturing sector' in Country X will experience a severe contraction. For this conclusion to be valid, the author must be assuming that the advanced electronics industry is significant enough to drag down the whole sector. Applying the Negation Test confirms this: if advanced electronics accounted for only a tiny fraction of the manufacturing sector, a drop in their sales would not cause the entire sector to contract, completely destroying the argument.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Deconstruct the argument to identify the main conclusion.
Conclusion: The manufacturing sector in Country X will likely experience a severe contraction this year.
Identifying the exact scope of the conclusion is the first step in finding the logical gap.
2
Identify the premises supporting the conclusion.
Premises: Rhodium prices tripled. Rhodium is essential for advanced electronics made in Country X. Thin margins mean prices must rise, which will cause a drastic drop in advanced electronics sales volume.
Understanding the evidence provided shows us what the author has explicitly proven.
3
Compare the scope of the premises to the scope of the conclusion to spot the logical gap.
The premises prove a drastic drop in sales for 'advanced electronics'. The conclusion makes a claim about the 'entire manufacturing sector' of Country X.
Arguments often mistakenly assume that what is true of a part is true of the whole (Composition flaw).
4
Apply the Negation Test to evaluate potential assumptions.
Negating the correct statement: 'Advanced electronics do NOT account for a large enough proportion...' If true, a drop in electronics sales would have a negligible impact, and the entire sector would NOT severely contract. The argument collapses.
A necessary assumption must destroy the argument when negated. If the argument survives the negation, the assumption was not logically necessary.

Anahtar Kavram

Bridging Part-to-Whole Scope Shifts and the Negation Test
Tahmini Süre:2m 0s
Bu soruyu puanla

Konular

Necessary Assumption

Bu konudan daha fazla soru