Examkin

Soru

Zorluk: OrtaFunction of Specific Details

Analyze the passage below outlining competing theories of monetary evolution. After reading, match each specific detail cited by the author to the primary rhetorical function it serves within the argument.

The traditional evolutionary model of money, championed by classical economists, posits that currency emerged organically to solve the 'double coincidence of wants' inherent in barter systems. Under this utilitarian paradigm, societies inevitably progress from barter to commodity money, and finally to fiat currency. However, anthropological research into the historical use of cowrie shells in West African trade networks severely undermines this linear narrative. Cowries were not initially adopted to facilitate cumbersome economic exchanges; rather, they were integrated into economic life because they already functioned as objects of social prestige and ceremonial authority. The robust nature of this socially embedded currency is best evidenced by the behavior of seventeenth-century European merchants. Rather than imposing their own monetary standards, these merchants were compelled to trade highly valued manufactured goods simply to stockpile cowries, which were required to purchase local commodities. Furthermore, the persistence of the cowrie economy well into the nineteenth century, even operating in parallel with introduced European coinage, contradicts the classical assumption that 'superior' utilitarian money naturally displaces earlier forms. Ultimately, the history of cowrie currency suggests that monetary systems are forged by cultural imperatives as much as by market efficiencies.

Match each passage detail to its correct argumentative function.

  • The 'double coincidence of wants'To identify the theoretical inefficiency that classical models assume catalyzed the invention of money
  • The 'social prestige and ceremonial authority' of cowriesTo introduce a cultural rationale that challenges purely utilitarian explanations for the adoption of currency
  • The behavior of 'seventeenth-century European merchants'To offer historical evidence demonstrating the capacity of an indigenous monetary system to dictate the terms of foreign trade
  • The 'persistence of the cowrie economy well into the nineteenth century'To undermine the premise that more technologically modern monetary forms inevitably supplant established regional currencies

Cevap

The details match their functions as follows: 'double coincidence of wants' identifies a theoretical inefficiency assumed by classical models; 'social prestige and ceremonial authority' introduces a cultural rationale challenging utilitarian explanations; 'seventeenth-century European merchants' offers historical evidence of an indigenous system dictating foreign trade terms; and 'persistence of the cowrie economy' undermines the premise that modern monetary forms inevitably supplant established ones.
Each correct match pairs a specific textual detail with the meta-argumentative role it plays. In dense LSAT passages, every detail is deployed purposefully to support a broader claim. The correct pairings align the concrete examples (e.g., merchants, nineteenth-century overlap) with the abstract logical moves they accomplish (e.g., demonstrating capacity, undermining a premise).

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Analyze the context surrounding the mention of the 'double coincidence of wants'.
It is described as the problem inherent in barter systems that classical economists believe currency emerged to solve.
Identifying the initial context establishes the baseline theory the author aims to refute.
2
Determine the rhetorical role of 'social prestige and ceremonial authority'.
It is presented as the actual reason cowries were integrated into economic life, contrasting directly with the classical utilitarian view.
Tracing this contrast reveals how the author introduces an alternative, non-commercial motivation for currency adoption.
3
Evaluate the purpose of detailing the behavior of 'seventeenth-century European merchants'.
The passage states they were compelled to stockpile cowries instead of imposing their own money, demonstrating the power of the local currency.
Connecting the merchants' actions to the local economy shows the passage is illustrating the robustness of the indigenous monetary paradigm.
4
Assess why the author mentions the 'persistence of the cowrie economy well into the nineteenth century'.
It is explicitly linked to contradicting the classical assumption that superior money naturally displaces primitive forms.
Linking the historical survival of the currency to the theoretical assumption it breaks confirms its function as a direct refutation of linear monetary evolution.

Anahtar Kavram

Function of Specific Details in Reading Comprehension
Bu soruyu puanla

Konular

Function of Specific Details

Bu konudan daha fazla soru