Examkin

Soru

Zorluk: OrtaExplaining Surprising Outcomes

In an attempt to reduce employee burnout and decrease staff turnover, a large accounting firm transitioned all its employees from a standard five-day workweek to a four-day workweek, keeping their annual salaries unchanged. Surprisingly, one year after this policy was implemented, employee surveys showed a significant increase in reported burnout, and the firm's staff turnover rate was higher than it had been in the previous five years. Which of the following, if true, most helps to resolve the apparent discrepancy in the information above?

  1. The firm maintained its previous weekly quota for billable hours, requiring employees to complete the same volume of work in fewer days.Cevap
  2. B
    Shortly after the firm changed its schedule, several competing accounting firms began offering substantial signing bonuses to attract experienced staff.
  3. C
    Employees who resigned during that year frequently cited the extended three-day weekend as the most appealing aspect of working at the firm.
  4. D
    Numerous organizational psychology studies indicate that a four-day workweek is generally effective at reducing stress when implemented in the technology sector.
  5. E
    Because the firm had downsized its total workforce earlier in the year, the absolute number of employees who quit remained constant even as the turnover percentage rose.

Cevap

The firm maintained its previous weekly quota for billable hours, requiring employees to complete the same volume of work in fewer days.
The correct answer perfectly resolves the apparent contradiction by introducing a practical consequence of the new policy. If employees are expected to complete five days' worth of billable hours in only four days, their daily workload and stress levels would increase significantly. This compressed and intensified schedule provides a logical, direct explanation for why they are experiencing more burnout and why they are leaving the firm at a higher rate, fully reconciling the firm's well-intentioned policy with its disastrous results.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Identify the two seemingly contradictory facts in the stimulus.
Fact 1: The firm implemented a four-day workweek to reduce burnout and turnover. Fact 2: Burnout and turnover actually increased after the policy was enacted.
Understanding the exact nature of the discrepancy is necessary to find a statement that reconciles the two facts.
2
Determine the criteria for the correct answer.
The correct answer must introduce new information that explains how working fewer days per week could actively cause employees to become more stressed and leave the firm.
A valid resolution must account for both of the negative outcomes simultaneously without contradicting the stated premises.
3
Evaluate the options based on the criteria.
Only the option regarding unchanged weekly quotas provides a causal mechanism. If the workload remains the same but the time to complete it decreases, daily stress increases, explaining both the burnout and the subsequent turnover.
Other options either explain only one side of the paradox, deepen the mystery, or rely on irrelevant external generalizations.

Anahtar Kavram

Identifying the Unintended Consequence
Bu soruyu puanla

Konular

Explaining Surprising Outcomes

Bu konudan daha fazla soru