A passage discussing administrative law outlines the following principle: A court must defer to a government agency's interpretation of a statute if the statute is inherently ambiguous, the agency's interpretation is reasonable, and the agency has not contradicted its own prior formal interpretations without providing a detailed, reasoned explanation for the change.
Based on this principle, if a statute governing emissions is found to be ambiguous and the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) issues a reasonable new interpretation that contradicts its formal interpretation from five years prior while failing to provide any explanation for the change, a court must defer to the EPA's new interpretation.
Cevap: Cevap
Cevap
False
The statement is false because the scenario explicitly states the EPA failed to provide any explanation for contradicting its prior formal interpretation. According to the principle, providing a detailed, reasoned explanation is a necessary condition for a court to defer when an agency contradicts its past interpretations.
Adım Adım Çözüm
Anahtar Kavram
Applying passage principles requires strict adherence to all necessary conditions and qualifiers mentioned in the text.