Read the following passage:
Traditional narratives of the Scientific Revolution frequently characterize the publication of Nicolaus Copernicus's *De revolutionibus orbium coelestium* in 1543 as an immediate, paradigm-shattering event that rapidly dismantled the Ptolemaic geocentric model. However, recent historiography of science reveals a far more gradual assimilation. Historians now emphasize that late-sixteenth-century astronomers initially adopted Copernicus's mathematical models primarily for their computational elegance in calculating planetary ephemerides, while explicitly rejecting his heliocentric physical cosmology. The astronomical community did not abandon geocentrism due to Copernicus's theoretical arguments; rather, it was the subsequent, compounding empirical anomalies—specifically Tycho Brahe’s observation of the 1572 supernova, which shattered the Aristotelian concept of immutable heavens, and Johannes Kepler’s derivation of elliptical orbits, which eliminated the need for complex epicycles—that ultimately forced the cosmological shift. Notably, however, while modern historians highlight these subsequent empirical catalysts, they concur with traditionalists that Copernicus’s original manuscript failed to provide a definitively superior predictive accuracy over the Ptolemaic system, an observation that helps explain its tepid initial reception.
Evaluate the following statement:
Based on the passage, modern historians concur with traditional narratives on all of the following points concerning the Copernican revolution EXCEPT the assertion that Copernicus's original manuscript lacked definitively superior predictive accuracy compared to the Ptolemaic system.
Cevap: Cevap