Passage A
For decades, the cognitive sciences were fiercely polarized by the linguistic relativity hypothesis, a framework traditionally associated with the pioneering work of Benjamin Lee Whorf. In its original, strongest formulation, the hypothesis posited a strict linguistic determinism: the assertion that language categorically determines thought, and that the grammatical and lexical structures of one's native tongue rigidly constrain the boundaries of one's conceptual capabilities. This deterministic paradigm was largely discredited by the late twentieth century, comprehensively supplanted by universalist theories, most notably those of Chomsky and Pinker, which forcefully argued that all human languages are merely surface manifestations of a shared, biologically hardwired underlying cognitive architecture.
Recently, however, cognitive linguistics has witnessed a pronounced paradigm shift as scholars have gravitated toward a more nuanced, probabilistic interpretation of linguistic relativity. Rather than imposing absolute, insurmountable limits on what can be conceptualized by a human mind, language is now understood by many contemporary researchers to habitually direct cognitive attention toward specific features of the experiential environment. Under this revised theoretical framework, linguistic structures do not inherently prevent speakers of divergent languages from grasping identical concepts; instead, they merely render certain cognitive pathways more effortless, habitual, or salient. This crucial theoretical pivot has re-legitimized the empirical study of linguistic influence, demanding rigorous, highly controlled cross-cultural methodologies that can effectively isolate the subtle but pervasive cognitive ripples generated by specific grammatical or lexical variations across populations.
Passage B
Recent groundbreaking investigations into spatial cognition among the Kuuk Thaayorre, an Aboriginal community residing in the Pormpuraaw settlement of Australia, offer compelling empirical insights into the precise mechanisms of linguistic influence on cognition. Unlike English, which heavily relies on egocentric, relative spatial terms such as "left," "right," "front," and "back," Kuuk Thaayorre exclusively employs absolute cardinal directions—north, south, east, and west. Furthermore, this absolute system is utilized relentlessly, even for minute, highly localized descriptions, such as specifying the position of a cup on a small table.
To rigorously investigate the potential non-linguistic cognitive ramifications of this ubiquitous linguistic feature, researchers designed a series of purely temporal arrangement tasks. Participants were asked to arrange a sequentially shuffled set of images depicting universal temporal progressions, such as a man aging or a crocodile growing. The results were striking. While English-speaking control subjects consistently arranged the images from left to right, entirely regardless of their own physical orientation in the testing room, the Kuuk Thaayorre participants invariably arranged the temporal sequences from east to west. If a Kuuk Thaayorre participant was facing south, they arranged the cards from left to right; if facing north, they arranged them from right to left. The study conclusively demonstrates that the mandatory, continuous use of absolute spatial coordinates in the Kuuk Thaayorre language profoundly habituates its speakers to maintain constant, background awareness of their precise geographic orientation.
Which one of the following most accurately describes the relationship between the two passages?
- APassage A chronicles the scientific rejection of a hypothesis, while Passage B presents recent evidence intended to validate the original, most extreme version of that hypothesis.
- BPassage A proposes a general theory regarding cognitive architecture, while Passage B offers an alternative theory based on observations of spatial reasoning.
- Passage A outlines the evolution of a theoretical paradigm and the type of research it necessitates, while Passage B describes a specific empirical investigation that aligns with that evolved paradigm.Cevap
- DPassage A argues that language strictly determines conceptual capabilities, and Passage B provides an example of this determinism by demonstrating that English speakers cannot conceptualize absolute space.
- EPassage A discusses the historical development of a scientific methodology, while Passage B points out the flaws in utilizing that methodology to study indigenous populations.