Examkin

Soru

Zorluk: KolayPerspective of Mentioned Groups

While artificial reefs—such as sunken ships or concrete blocks intentionally placed on the ocean floor—are often championed by local municipalities as boons for marine biodiversity and recreational fishing, a contingent of marine researchers known as 'ecological purists' views them with deep skepticism. According to these purists, artificial reefs do not necessarily increase overall fish populations; rather, they often simply attract existing marine life away from natural habitats, effectively acting as 'ecological traps.' Furthermore, the purists argue that this artificial concentration of marine life makes fish significantly more vulnerable to overfishing and disrupts established, natural migratory routes. Despite the immediate economic benefits touted by local governments, the purists maintain that introducing man-made structures into underwater environments compromises long-term ecological stability.

Based on the passage, the 'ecological purists' would be most likely to agree with which of the following statements regarding artificial reefs?

  1. They gather marine life into specific locations in a manner that can heighten the risk of overfishing.Cevap
  2. B
    They are highly beneficial initiatives that primarily serve to boost local municipal economies through recreational fishing.
  3. C
    They will always result in the permanent eradication of ancient migratory routes for all ocean species.
  4. D
    They fail to increase overall fish populations because they are placed within pristine underwater environments.
  5. E
    They should be completely banned worldwide, and all existing man-made ocean structures must be immediately dismantled.

Cevap

The correct answer is the statement that artificial reefs gather marine life into specific locations in a manner that can heighten the risk of overfishing.
The correct answer accurately synthesizes the purists' explicit claim that artificial reefs act as 'ecological traps' by concentrating marine life, which subsequently makes the fish 'significantly more vulnerable to overfishing.' This directly and safely aligns with the textual evidence regarding the group's perspective.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Identify the specific group asked about in the question stem.
The question asks for the perspective of the 'ecological purists'.
To ensure the correct viewpoint is analyzed, avoiding confusion with the author or other mentioned groups like the 'local municipalities'.
2
Locate the textual evidence describing this group's viewpoint.
The purists believe reefs act as 'ecological traps' that attract existing fish, make fish 'significantly more vulnerable to overfishing', and disrupt migratory routes.
The correct answer must be a direct inference or paraphrase of these specific points.
3
Evaluate the options against the group's stated perspective.
The option stating that reefs gather marine life and heighten the risk of overfishing perfectly matches the passage's claim that concentration makes fish vulnerable to human exploitation.
To select the logically sound inference while eliminating distractors that misattribute views, overstate certainty, or illogically combine passage phrases.

Anahtar Kavram

Perspective of Mentioned Groups
Bu soruyu puanla

Konular

Perspective of Mentioned Groups

Bu konudan daha fazla soru