Soru

Zorluk: KolayIdentifying Sufficient Assumptions

Match each argument (composed of a premise and a conclusion) with the sufficient assumption required to make its conclusion logically follow.

  • Premise: Every city official attended the seminar.
    Conclusion: Every city official understands the new tax code.
    Anyone who attended the seminar understands the new tax code.
  • Premise: The proposed legislation reduces carbon emissions.
    Conclusion: The proposed legislation will receive the mayor's endorsement.
    The mayor will endorse any legislation that reduces carbon emissions.
  • Premise: This novel features a highly complex plot.
    Conclusion: This novel is likely to win the literary award.
    A novel is likely to win the literary award if it features a highly complex plot.
  • Premise: The restaurant uses only locally sourced ingredients.
    Conclusion: The restaurant provides a healthy dining option.
    Using only locally sourced ingredients is enough to ensure a restaurant provides a healthy dining option.

Cevap

The correct pairings connect the isolated premise concept in each argument to its isolated conclusion concept, ensuring strict deductive sufficiency.
Each correct pairing directly connects the specific evidence provided in the premise to the specific claim made in the conclusion. Because these are straightforward conditional arguments, the sufficient assumption in each case takes the form 'If [Premise Concept], then [Conclusion Concept]', which logically guarantees that the conclusion follows from the premise.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Analyze the first argument to identify the premise and the conclusion.
Premise: City officials -> attended seminar. Conclusion: City officials -> understand tax code.
Identifying the distinct components is necessary to find the logical gap.
2
Determine the logical gap for the first argument.
The gap is between 'attended the seminar' and 'understands the new tax code'.
A sufficient assumption must link the unconnected premise term directly to the unconnected conclusion term.
3
Find the assumption that bridges the gap for the first argument.
The assumption 'Anyone who attended the seminar understands the new tax code' bridges this gap perfectly.
This establishes the conditional relationship needed to guarantee the conclusion.
4
Repeat this process for the remaining three arguments.
The logical gaps are: emissions to endorsement, complex plot to winning the award, and locally sourced ingredients to healthy dining.
Each argument follows a simple A -> B, B -> C structure requiring the B -> C bridge.

Anahtar Kavram

A sufficient assumption provides the missing logical link that, when added to the premises, guarantees the truth of the conclusion.
Tahmini Süre:1m 30s
Bu soruyu puanla