Corporate Consultant: To boost overall employee productivity, our company should replace standard office chairs with standing desks. A recent occupational health study found that office workers who switched to standing desks experienced a significant decrease in chronic back pain. Furthermore, it is well established that employees who experience less overall physical discomfort are able to maintain concentration on their tasks for significantly longer periods.
Which one of the following is an assumption on which the corporate consultant's argument depends?
- The reduction in back pain experienced by standing desk users is not typically offset by an increase in other forms of physical discomfort.Cevap
- BStanding desks are the single most effective intervention available for reducing physical discomfort among office workers.
- CEvery employee at the company who currently uses a standard office chair suffers from some degree of chronic back pain.
- DThe primary cause of back pain among the company's employees is the prolonged use of standard office chairs.
- EThe financial cost of replacing standard office chairs with standing desks will be fully recovered through subsequent gains in employee productivity.
Cevap
The assumption that the reduction in back pain is not offset by an increase in other forms of physical discomfort.
The argument relies on a shift from a specific benefit (reduced back pain) to a general requirement (less overall physical discomfort). For this shift to be valid, the author must assume that the specific benefit isn't canceled out by a new specific harm. By negating the correct option—assuming that other discomforts DO increase and offset the back pain reduction—the employees would no longer experience the 'less overall physical discomfort' required to increase concentration, causing the argument to fall apart.
Adım Adım Çözüm
Anahtar Kavram
Necessary Assumption
Tahmini Süre:1m 30s