Soru

Zorluk: ZorSpecific Detail Inferences

Read the following passage carefully.

In the early twentieth century, the scientific consensus regarding Earth’s geological history was firmly rooted in "fixism"—the paradigm asserting that the relative positions of the continents were immutable. When Alfred Wegener proposed his theory of continental drift in 1912, positing that continents had slowly plowed through the ocean floor, the geological establishment mobilized vigorously to defend the fixist model. The most formidable challenge for fixists was accounting for the striking paleontological continuity across widely separated landmasses. The fossilized remains of the Permian freshwater reptile *Mesosaurus* had been discovered in both Brazil and South Africa, while the heavy seeds of the *Glossopteris* fern were found distributed across South America, Africa, India, and Antarctica.

Because these organisms lacked the anatomical capacity to traverse thousands of miles of open ocean, fixist paleontologists proposed the existence of massive, ancient "land bridges"—transoceanic causeways that supposedly connected the continents during the Paleozoic and Mesozoic eras but had since subsided beneath the waves. This ad hoc hypothesis preserved the immutability of continental positions while explaining the biological distribution.

However, the land bridge hypothesis inadvertently collided with the emerging principle of isostasy, a fundamental geophysical concept demonstrating that the Earth's crust floats on a denser, plastic mantle. According to isostasy, the lighter granitic rock comprising continental crust cannot simply sink into the denser basaltic rock of the ocean floor, just as an iceberg cannot sink entirely into water. By asserting that continental-type rock had subsided to form the ocean floor, land bridge theorists implicitly contradicted the very laws of buoyancy governing the Earth's lithosphere. Furthermore, the volume of water displaced by these hypothetical sunken continents would have raised global sea levels dramatically, flooding the interiors of the remaining landmasses—a catastrophic inundation for which there was no geological evidence in the stratigraphic record.

Thus, while the land bridge hypothesis successfully neutralized the biological anomalies without abandoning fixism, it introduced geophysical paradoxes that were, ironically, far more mathematically intractable than Wegener's initial proposal of drifting continents.

Based on the passage, match each specific textual detail on the left with the logical inference that can most strongly be drawn from it on the right.

  • The passage describes the seeds of the Glossopteris fern as "heavy."The plant's geographic spread across multiple continents could not have relied primarily on wind currents crossing open oceans.
  • The passage compares continental crust floating on the mantle to an iceberg in water.Granitic rock masses cannot achieve negative buoyancy relative to the denser mantle material.
  • Fixists proposed that ancient transoceanic causeways "subsided beneath the waves."Portions of present-day deep ocean basins were hypothesized by some scientists to have once been dry land.
  • There is no stratigraphic evidence of catastrophic flooding of continental interiors.The total volume of Earth's ocean water was not drastically displaced by sinking continental structures.

Cevap

The correct matches pair the seed weight with the impossibility of wind dispersal, the iceberg analogy with buoyancy constraints, the subsidence hypothesis with ocean basins formerly being dry land, and the lack of flooding evidence with the absence of ocean displacement.
Each correct pairing links a specific textual assertion with its unstated but logically mandatory downstream consequence, strictly bounded by the information provided in the passage without relying on outside knowledge.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Analyze the implication of the 'heavy' seeds.
Matches with the inability of wind currents to carry the plant across oceans.
Specific details about physical weight are provided to rule out aerodynamic dispersal mechanisms.
2
Determine what the iceberg analogy entails for isostasy.
Matches with the inability of granitic rock to achieve negative buoyancy.
An iceberg floats because it is less dense than water; similarly, continents cannot sink because they are less dense than the mantle.
3
Evaluate the logical consequence of the land bridge subsidence hypothesis.
Matches with the implication that present-day ocean basins were once dry land.
If a causeway spanned an ocean and sank to the bottom, that section of the modern ocean floor was necessarily dry land in the past.
4
Identify what is proven by the lack of stratigraphic flooding evidence.
Matches with the conclusion that ocean water was not displaced.
If displacement guarantees flooding, the absence of flooding logically guarantees the absence of displacement.

Anahtar Kavram

Specific Detail Inferences in Reading Comprehension
Bu soruyu puanla