Soru

Zorluk: ZorWeaken

Neurobiologist: In a recent experiment, laboratory mice whose daily diets were supplemented with the artificial sweetener Zytrol performed significantly worse on spatial memory tasks than a group of mice whose diets were supplemented with an equal caloric amount of natural sucrose. Therefore, we can conclude that the consumption of Zytrol actively impairs spatial memory function.

Statement: The newly discovered fact that mice fed a standard baseline diet containing neither Zytrol nor sucrose performed identically on the spatial memory tasks to the mice fed Zytrol significantly weakens the neurobiologist's argument.

Cevap: Cevap

Cevap

True
The statement accurately identifies a classic weakening scenario involving experimental baselines. The neurobiologist's argument relies on a flawed comparison, implicitly assuming the sucrose group represents normal cognitive function. By revealing that a truly neutral baseline yields the exact same results as the Zytrol group, the new evidence shifts the causal arrow, indicating that sucrose improves memory rather than Zytrol impairing it. This destroys the argument's core causal claim, making the statement definitively true.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Analyze the argument's structure to isolate the premise and conclusion.
Premise: Zytrol-fed mice performed worse than sucrose-fed mice. Conclusion: Zytrol actively impairs memory.
Identifying the core components of the argument is necessary to spot the logical gap.
2
Identify the logical flaw in the neurobiologist's reasoning.
The argument lacks a proper neutral control group, conflating a relative difference (worse than sucrose) with an absolute decline (active impairment).
Recognizing the flawed comparison reveals how the argument is vulnerable to attack.
3
Assess the logical impact of the new statement provided in the prompt.
The statement introduces a neutral baseline group that performs identically to the Zytrol group, proving Zytrol causes no deviation from normal function.
We must evaluate whether this new information exploits the logical gap identified in Step 2.
4
Determine if the new statement weakens the argument.
Yes. It provides an alternative cause for the performance gap (sucrose enhances memory, Zytrol does nothing), thereby severely weakening the original claim.
Concluding the evaluation of the statement's effect on the argument.

Anahtar Kavram

Weaken
Bu soruyu puanla

Konular