Soru

Zorluk: Çok zorWeaken

Analyze the four arguments below. Match each argument (Left) to the specific piece of new evidence (Right) that most severely weakens its conclusion by exposing its underlying logical flaw.

  • Paleontologist: The extinction of the large flightless birds in this region was almost certainly driven by the arrival of early human settlers. Fossil evidence demonstrates a rapid collapse in the bird population that perfectly coincides with the earliest known human encampments in the valley.A rapid, severe climatic shift that decimated the specific vegetation the large flightless birds relied upon also created the arid conditions that forced early humans to migrate into the valley.
  • Financial Analyst: To maximize long-term profitability, our corporation must immediately transition to an open-allocation management structure. A comprehensive industry review shows that 85% of the most highly profitable tech companies currently utilize an open-allocation framework.Transitioning to and maintaining an open-allocation management structure requires an enormous baseline of excess capital that only firms already experiencing peak profitability can sustain.
  • School Board Administrator: The new intensive tutoring program is clearly working to improve overall math proficiency. In the district where it was implemented, the absolute number of students failing the standardized math assessment plummeted by nearly 50% this year.Due to the closure of the district's largest manufacturing plant, the district experienced a massive population exodus, resulting in a 55% reduction in total student enrollment this year.
  • Medical Researcher: The new synthetic-polymer heart valve is more effective than the traditional mechanical valve. Clinical surveys show that patients who received the synthetic valve experienced a significantly lower rate of post-surgical complications and faster recovery times.Due to the experimental nature of the synthetic-polymer valve, surgeons were strictly instructed to implant it only in younger patients with no secondary health conditions.

Cevap

The Paleontologist argument matches the climatic shift evidence (exposing a third-variable cause). The Financial Analyst argument matches the capital baseline evidence (exposing reverse causation). The School Board argument matches the population exodus evidence (exposing a numbers vs. percentages flaw). The Medical Researcher argument matches the younger patients evidence (exposing selection bias).
Each correct pairing perfectly exploits the specific logical gap in the stimulus. The climate shift introduces a common cause for the paleontological correlation. The capital requirement introduces reverse causation for the financial correlation. The population drop attacks the numerical basis of the educational claim. The surgical instructions expose a fatal selection bias in the medical claim.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Analyze the Paleontologist argument for its logical gap.
Identified a correlation-to-causation flaw based on simultaneous occurrences.
Finding an alternate cause or a third factor that causes both events is the standard way to weaken this type of causal claim.
2
Analyze the Financial Analyst argument.
Identified a correlation between a management structure and profitability.
Since the evidence is just a cross-sectional snapshot (highly profitable companies have this structure), it is vulnerable to reverse causation—they might have the structure because they are profitable.
3
Analyze the School Board Administrator argument.
Identified a claim of improved proficiency based solely on a drop in the absolute number of failures.
Absolute numbers cannot prove a change in rate or quality without knowing the total base size. A change in the base population is the most direct weakener.
4
Analyze the Medical Researcher argument.
Identified an observational comparison between two groups of patients with different treatments.
Without a randomized controlled trial, the groups might not be equivalent. Pointing out a pre-existing advantage in one group (selection bias) destroys the conclusion that the treatment itself caused the better outcome.

Anahtar Kavram

Identifying and attacking specific structural flaws in causal reasoning, statistical evidence, and observational comparisons.
Bu soruyu puanla

Konular