Soru

Zorluk: ZorExclusion Questions (EXCEPT/LEAST/NOT)

Read the following passage regarding the history of biological taxonomy.

Prior to the late 1970s, the biological classification of life was dominated by a rigid two-empire dichotomy: eukaryotes, which possess a membrane-bound nucleus, and prokaryotes, which lack one. This morphological paradigm, heavily reliant on microscopic observation, assumed that cellular structure was the most accurate proxy for evolutionary relatedness. Because all known bacteria lacked a nucleus, they were uniformly grouped into the prokaryotic empire, a classification that implied a shared, exclusive evolutionary history distinct from all eukaryotic organisms.

In 1977, Carl Woese and George Fox challenged this entrenched orthodoxy by shifting the basis of classification from cellular morphology to molecular genetics. By sequencing 16S ribosomal RNA—a highly conserved molecule present in all living organisms—Woese discovered that a group of methane-producing microbes, previously classified as bacteria, were as genetically distant from standard bacteria as they were from plants and animals. Woese proposed that these organisms, later named Archaea, represented a distinct third domain of life.

The scientific establishment initially mounted a fierce defense of the bipartite system. Traditionalists, led most notably by evolutionary biologist Ernst Mayr, dismissed Woese’s genetic evidence as insufficient to warrant a taxonomic overhaul. Critics argued that 16S rRNA analysis was an unreliable metric for deep evolutionary divergence, contending instead that the profound morphological distinction between cells with and without a nucleus was the only biologically meaningful dividing line. Furthermore, detractors hypothesized that the genetic peculiarities of methanogens were simply rapid evolutionary responses to extreme environmental conditions rather than evidence of ancient phylogenetic divergence.

Ultimately, the three-domain model prevailed as subsequent biochemical analyses corroborated Woese’s genetic findings. Researchers discovered that, despite their superficial resemblance to bacteria, Archaea possess unique cellular features, including ether-linked membrane lipids and complex RNA polymerases that more closely resemble those of eukaryotes. Additionally, the complete absence of peptidoglycan—a defining structural polymer in bacterial cell walls—cemented the status of Archaea as a fundamentally separate lineage.

According to the passage, the traditionalists who defended the bipartite system of classification relied on all of the following arguments or assumptions EXCEPT:

  1. A
    Cellular morphology serves as the most accurate proxy for determining deep evolutionary relatedness.
  2. B
    The genetic anomalies observed in methanogens were the result of rapid evolutionary adaptation to extreme environments.
  3. The complete absence of peptidoglycan in certain microbes' cell walls is insufficient evidence to justify a taxonomic overhaul.Cevap
  4. D
    Sequencing conserved molecules like 16S ribosomal RNA is an unreliable method for establishing ancient phylogenetic boundaries.
  5. E
    All cellular organisms lacking a membrane-bound nucleus share a common, exclusive evolutionary history.

Cevap

The option stating that the complete absence of peptidoglycan in certain microbes' cell walls is insufficient evidence to justify a taxonomic overhaul is the correct answer.
The correct answer is the option indicating that the absence of peptidoglycan is insufficient evidence to justify a taxonomic overhaul. According to the final paragraph, the absence of peptidoglycan in archaeal cell walls was one of the subsequent biochemical discoveries that 'cemented the status of Archaea as a fundamentally separate lineage.' The passage never states that traditionalist critics addressed or dismissed evidence regarding peptidoglycan; their resistance was entirely based on the primacy of cellular morphology (nucleus vs. no nucleus) and a rejection of the 16S rRNA molecular data.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Analyze the question stem to determine the task.
The stem asks to identify the one argument or assumption that was NOT relied upon by the traditionalist critics of Carl Woese.
This is a negative detail (EXCEPT) question, requiring a process of elimination to find the unmentioned or unsupported claim.
2
Scan the passage for the specific arguments and assumptions made by the 'traditionalists' or 'critics'.
Paragraphs 1 and 3 reveal their views: morphology is the best proxy for relatedness (Paragraph 1/3), 16S rRNA is unreliable for deep divergence (Paragraph 3), genetic anomalies were just rapid environmental adaptations (Paragraph 3), and all organisms without a nucleus share an exclusive lineage (Paragraph 1).
Locating the exact textual evidence for the critics' viewpoint is necessary to eliminate the four supported options.
3
Evaluate the option regarding peptidoglycan against the text.
Peptidoglycan is mentioned in Paragraph 4 as a subsequent discovery that proved Archaea were a separate lineage, not as an argument used by the critics.
Because the critics did not argue that the absence of peptidoglycan was insufficient evidence (they argued against the genetic rRNA evidence), this is the unsupported statement.

Anahtar Kavram

Identifying explicitly excluded details and tracking viewpoint attributions across a complex text.
Bu soruyu puanla