A city introduced a substantial congestion charge aimed at reducing the number of passenger vehicles entering the downtown area during peak hours. However, six months after the charge's implementation, the number of passenger vehicles entering the downtown area during peak hours had actually increased by 15 percent.
The apparent discrepancy is successfully resolved by the additional fact that surveys show most downtown commuters consider the new congestion charge to be a severe financial burden.
Cevap: Cevap
Cevap
False
The proposed statement is false because the additional fact does not bridge the gap between the premises; instead, it makes the discrepancy even more baffling. If the congestion charge is viewed as a severe financial burden, one would naturally expect commuters to seek alternatives, leading to a decrease in traffic. Because the fact does not explain the unexpected increase in vehicles, it fails to serve as a valid resolution.
Adım Adım Çözüm
Anahtar Kavram
Bridging Conflicting Premises