Read the following passage:
The historically informed performance (HIP) movement posits that classical music should be performed using period instruments to faithfully realize the composer's original intent. Proponents of strict HIP argue that modern instruments, with their expanded dynamic ranges and different timbres, inherently distort the musical narrative envisioned by Baroque and Classical composers. However, musicological pragmatists push back against this purist approach. They contend that because modern audiences possess vastly different auditory expectations and cultural contexts than eighteenth-century listeners, attempting an exact acoustic replica fails to recreate the original emotional impact of the work. Furthermore, certain radical interpretationists argue that a musical score is merely a skeletal framework; they insist that performers must actively reshape the work using contemporary sensibilities to prevent historical compositions from becoming sterile museum artifacts.
Based on the passage, match each viewpoint regarding musical performance to the unstated underlying assumption upon which its argument necessarily relies.
- Strict HIP proponents' assertion that modern instruments distort the composer's envisioned narrative.The expressive substance of a composition cannot be abstracted from the specific technological constraints of its original era.
- Musicological pragmatists' claim that acoustic replicas fail to recreate the music's original emotional impact.The aesthetic efficacy of a performance is heavily contingent upon the listener's preexisting auditory conditioning.
- Radical interpretationists' demand that performers actively reshape works using contemporary sensibilities.Historical artworks lack intrinsic cultural vitality and will stagnate unless continually adapted to reflect present-day values.