Examkin

Soru

Zorluk: OrtaStrengthen

Match each of the following arguments with the supplementary finding that provides the strongest logical support for its stated conclusion.

  • Archaeologists conclude that ceramic vessels excavated at an inland plateau settlement were imported from distant river valleys rather than manufactured locally, since the mineral profile of the clay matches deposits located two hundred kilometers away.Pottery kilns and clay beds situated near the plateau settlement contain specific trace iron compounds that are entirely absent from all analyzed excavated vessels.
  • Botanists conclude that the sudden die-off of a perennial desert shrub across an arid basin was caused by a newly introduced fungal pathogen rather than a concurrent drought, since the die-off occurred first and most severely in the basin's wettest subregions.The identified fungal spores proliferate and infect root systems only under sustained humid soil conditions, whereas the desert shrub possesses extensive adaptations that tolerate multi-year droughts.
  • Historians conclude that a monumental inscription discovered at an ancient port city was commissioned by visiting seafaring merchants rather than the local governing council, since the text incorporates counting glyphs identical to those used exclusively in overseas island registries.Statutory edicts issued by the local governing council strictly mandated that all official civic monuments adhere to a standardized native orthography that prohibited foreign accounting symbols.

Cevap

Each argument matches the finding that addresses its primary evidential gap: the ceramic argument matches the trace mineral absence in local clay beds; the botanical argument matches the spore germination requirements and drought tolerance; and the historical inscription argument matches the council's prohibition against foreign glyphs.
For the pottery argument, ruling out local clay composition directly reinforces the conclusion of importation. For the botanical argument, demonstrating that the pathogen thrives in moisture while the shrub resists drought confirms pathogen causality over drought. For the epigraphic argument, showing that local rulers were legally prohibited from using foreign glyphs supports foreign merchant commissioning.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Identify the conclusion and inferential gap in each argument on the left.
The ceramic argument assumes local clay could not have produced the pottery; the botanical argument assumes the wet-area pattern aligns with disease rather than drought; the epigraphic argument assumes local authorities would not use foreign counting symbols.
Strengthening an argument requires finding a premise that eliminates alternative explanations or substantiates an unstated assumption.
2
Evaluate the findings on the right to match each with the specific logical gap it bridges.
The absence of local clay trace compounds rules out local manufacturing; the moisture requirement and drought resistance confirm the pathogen mechanism over drought; the native orthography decree rules out local council authorship.
Each correct match provides direct support specifically tailored to the causal vulnerability of the corresponding stimulus.

Anahtar Kavram

Strengthening logical arguments by eliminating alternative explanations, verifying causal mechanisms, and validating necessary assumptions.
Tahmini Süre:1m 30s
Bu soruyu puanla

Konular

Strengthen

Bu konudan daha fazla soru