Consider the following argument.
Marine Biologist: To restore the local sea otter population, we must restrict commercial fishing in the bay. Commercial fishing depletes the population of sea urchins, which are the primary food source for sea otters in this region, so limiting fishing will lead to an increase in otter numbers.
Statement: The marine biologist's argument logically requires the assumption that restricting commercial fishing in the bay will succeed in increasing the population of sea urchins.
Cevap: Cevap
Cevap
True. The argument inherently requires the assumption that limiting fishing will successfully increase the sea urchin population.
The statement correctly identifies an unstated premise strictly required by the argument. The argument's entire causal chain depends on the fishing restriction actually restoring the urchin population; without this taking place, the conclusion that otter numbers will increase cannot logically follow.
Adım Adım Çözüm
Anahtar Kavram
Identifying Necessary Assumptions via the Negation Technique