Examkin

Soru

Zorluk: Çok zorStrengthen

Literary Historian: In the nineteenth century, novels serialized in periodicals were substantially longer on average than those published directly as single volumes. Traditional scholarship attributes this discrepancy to financial opportunism, arguing that because authors were compensated by the word, they artificially padded their serialized works with superfluous subplots. This economic explanation, however, fundamentally misunderstands the medium. Serialized novels required readers to wait weeks between installments. To sustain engagement and prevent attrition over these prolonged intervals, authors were structurally compelled to interweave multiple narrative threads and extensive supporting casts. Therefore, the sheer length of serialized novels was a functional byproduct of the medium's temporal constraints, rather than an artifact of payment structures.

Which of the following, if true, provides the strongest support for the literary historian's conclusion?

  1. Nineteenth-century authors who negotiated fixed-sum serialization contracts, receiving a predetermined payment regardless of a manuscript's final word count, produced novels exhibiting the same extensive length and narrative density as those serialized under per-word compensation models.Cevap
  2. B
    When nineteenth-century publishers eventually shifted entirely from per-word compensation to flat-fee payments, the average length of newly commissioned serialized novels decreased significantly.
  3. C
    Novels initially published directly as single volumes were rarely adapted into serialized formats by magazines later in the century, regardless of the novels' overall length or narrative complexity.
  4. D
    The episodic cliffhangers commonly used at the end of serialized installments to ensure readers purchased the subsequent issue were almost never utilized by authors writing directly for single-volume publication.
  5. E
    Because the per-word payment rates offered by nineteenth-century magazine publishers were relatively low, many authors were forced to write and serialize multiple novels simultaneously to earn a sustainable income.

Cevap

The statement detailing that authors with fixed-sum contracts produced novels of the same extensive length and density as those paid by the word.
The argument involves a dispute over the cause of a phenomenon (the immense length of serialized novels). The historian dismisses a financial motive and posits a narrative motive. The correct answer acts as a perfect scientific control: it introduces a scenario where the financial motive is entirely removed (authors are paid a fixed sum regardless of word count). Because the novels remain just as long in this scenario, the financial motive is definitively ruled out as the primary cause. Eliminating a prominent alternative cause strongly fortifies the author's preferred causal explanation.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Analyze the argument's causal structure.
The phenomenon is that serialized novels are longer than single-volume novels. The traditional view claims Cause X (per-word payment) leads to this length. The historian argues Cause Y (temporal constraints requiring complex subplots) leads to this length, not Cause X.
Understanding the competing causal claims is necessary to know what evidence will support the author's specific conclusion over the rival theory.
2
Determine the goal of the question.
Identify a premise that provides the strongest support for the historian's conclusion (Cause Y, not Cause X).
The question stem explicitly asks for the strongest support for the historian's conclusion.
3
Pre-phrase the ideal strengthener.
The best strengthener will either provide direct evidence that temporal constraints necessitated the subplots, or it will sever the link between the per-word payment and the length (e.g., showing length remained long even without per-word payment).
In LSAT causal arguments, eliminating the alternate cause is one of the most effective ways to strengthen a favored causal explanation.
4
Evaluate the options against the pre-phrase.
The correct option explicitly provides a control scenario where Cause X (per-word payment) is eliminated via fixed-sum contracts, yet the phenomenon (extensive length) persists. This proves Cause X is not necessary, leaving Cause Y as the dominant explanation.
This rigorously isolates the variable in dispute, providing structural logical support for the historian.

Anahtar Kavram

Evaluating Alternative Causal Explanations in Arguments
Bu soruyu puanla

Konular

Strengthen

Bu konudan daha fazla soru