Examkin

Soru

Zorluk: ZorPrinciple Questions

The Municipal Transit Authority recently implemented an automated dispatch system designed to optimize bus route allocations. Although the system demonstrably reduced average commuter wait times across the city, the municipal oversight board mandated that the transit authority immediately suspend the automated system. The board justified this intervention by pointing out that because the underlying neural network architecture prevents human supervisors from reconstructing the precise rationale behind individual route alterations, affected commuters who dispute service reallocations cannot be provided with an intelligible explanation.

Which one of the following principles, if valid, most helps to justify the municipal oversight board's mandate?

  1. A
    A public oversight board is justified in suspending an administrative initiative only if that initiative fails to generate measurable improvements in overall operational efficiency.
  2. B
    An administrative agency is obligated to deploy an automated dispatch system whenever that system is capable of providing clear and intelligible rationales to all affected citizens.
  3. A public administrative body should not employ a decision-making system, regardless of its aggregate efficiency benefits, if that system prevents the agency from providing an intelligible rationale to individuals who contest decisions affecting them.Cevap
  4. D
    Municipal regulatory bodies must permanently prohibit any computational technology whose internal processing mechanisms cannot be fully comprehended by every member of the general public.
  5. E
    Public transit authorities should prioritize the minimization of commuter complaints over the optimization of transit route efficiency.

Cevap

A public administrative body should not employ a decision-making system, regardless of its aggregate efficiency benefits, if that system prevents the agency from providing an intelligible rationale to individuals who contest decisions affecting them.
The argument concludes that the oversight board was justified in mandating the suspension of the automated dispatch system because commuters disputing service changes cannot be given an intelligible explanation, despite the system's demonstrable efficiency gains. The correct principle provides the exact missing bridge: it establishes that preventing an agency from providing an intelligible rationale to individuals contesting decisions is sufficient to prohibit deploying the system, regardless of aggregate efficiency.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Analyze the stimulus and isolate premises and conclusion
Premises: The automated system reduced average wait times, but its architecture prevents supervisors from explaining the rationale for specific route alterations to commuters disputing service changes. Conclusion: The oversight board was justified in mandating the immediate suspension of the system.
Principle-Justify questions require identifying the exact gap between factual premises and normative conclusions.
2
Identify the logical gap to bridge
The premises show a trade-off between aggregate efficiency gains and individualized procedural explainability. The board prioritized explainability over efficiency to justify suspension.
The correct principle must state a general normative rule that makes the lack of explainability a sufficient condition for suspending or prohibiting the system despite its efficiency benefits.
3
Evaluate candidate principles against the structural requirement
The principle asserting that an administrative body should not use a decision-making system if it precludes providing intelligible rationales to contesting individuals—even with aggregate efficiency gains—fully bridges the gap.
This conditional rule directly yields the conclusion when applied to the facts in the stimulus without requiring extra assumptions.

Anahtar Kavram

Principle Justification / Normative Bridging
Bu soruyu puanla

Konular

Principle Questions

Bu konudan daha fazla soru