Examkin

Soru

Zorluk: KolayRole in Argument

Consider the following argument regarding agricultural soil conservation:

Some agronomists argue that cover cropping is too labor-intensive to justify its adoption on family farms. However, this view fails to account for long-term soil regeneration. Recent agricultural trials demonstrate that cover crops significantly reduce topsoil erosion during winter rains. Reduced erosion preserves vital soil nutrients year after year. Therefore, implementing cover crops ultimately increases long-term farm profitability.

Match each excerpt from the argument to the exact functional role it plays in the reasoning.

  • "Cover cropping is too labor-intensive to justify its adoption on family farms."A counterargument that the author seeks to undermine
  • "Cover crops significantly reduce topsoil erosion during winter rains."An empirical premise offered to support a subsidiary inference
  • "Reduced erosion preserves vital soil nutrients year after year."An intermediate conclusion that provides support for the primary claim
  • "Implementing cover crops ultimately increases long-term farm profitability."The main conclusion that the argument as a whole seeks to establish

Cevap

The statement about cover cropping being labor-intensive matches the counterargument to be undermined; the statement about reducing erosion matches the empirical premise; the statement about preserving vital nutrients matches the intermediate conclusion; and the statement about increasing profitability matches the main conclusion.
Each excerpt fulfills a distinct structural function in the multi-tiered argument: the first is an opposing view introduced to be refuted; the second is trial data acting as a foundational premise; the third is an intermediate conclusion drawn from that data; and the fourth is the overall conclusion supported by the entire chain.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Identify the author's primary conclusion and opposing viewpoint in the stimulus.
The final sentence asserting that cover crops increase profitability is the primary conclusion, while the initial view of some agronomists serves as the opposing position being challenged.
Establishing the boundary between what the author believes and what opponents believe clarifies the argument's overarching purpose.
2
Trace the structural relationship between intermediate premises and conclusions.
Trial evidence about erosion reduction directly supports the claim that nutrients are preserved, which in turn supports the main conclusion regarding profitability.
Differentiating between basic factual premises and intermediate claims depends on identifying which statements receive and provide support.
3
Align each excerpt with its corresponding argumentative role.
All four statements pair accurately with their distinct roles: counterargument, empirical premise, intermediate conclusion, and main conclusion.
Each structural category has a distinct functional relationship to the overall thesis.

Anahtar Kavram

Role in Argument: Identifying Structural Components and Sub-conclusions
Tahmini Süre:1m 0s
Bu soruyu puanla

Konular

Role in Argument

Bu konudan daha fazla soru