Examkin

Logical Reasoning

666 soru

Tüm türler666Çoktan seçmeli343Çoklu seçim54Doğru / Yanlış70Eşleştirme166Sıralama18Boşluk doldurma10Kısa cevap5
Soru 341Soru →

Archivist: Every historical document treated with vapor phase deacidification is completely free of acidic deterioration. The recently recovered municipal charter was treated with vapor phase deacidification. Therefore, the municipal charter is suitable for permanent archival display.

The archivist's conclusion follows logically if which one of the following is assumed?

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: Any historical document that is completely free of acidic deterioration is suitable for permanent archival display.

Cevap

The argument's conclusion is fully guaranteed if it is assumed that any historical document completely free of acidic deterioration is suitable for permanent archival display.
The correct option provides the exact missing premise needed to form a valid deductive syllogism. The premises establish that the municipal charter was treated with vapor phase deacidification, which guarantees it is completely free of acidic deterioration. Connecting 'completely free of acidic deterioration' directly to 'suitable for permanent archival display' guarantees the truth of the conclusion without exception.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Identify the premises and the conclusion.
Premise 1: Municipal charter was treated with vapor phase deacidification. Premise 2: Treated with vapor phase deacidification implies free of acidic deterioration. Intermediate inference: Municipal charter is free of acidic deterioration. Conclusion: Municipal charter is suitable for permanent archival display.
Deconstructing the argument isolates the stated evidentiary basis from the final claim.
2
Identify the deductive gap between the premises and the conclusion.
The premises prove the charter is 'free of acidic deterioration', but the conclusion introduces the new term 'suitable for permanent archival display'.
A sufficient assumption must provide a bridge that connects the established condition to the conclusion's new predicate.
3
Formulate the required conditional link.
If a document is free of acidic deterioration, then it is suitable for permanent archival display (Free of Deterioration -> Suitable for Display).
This conditional rule completes the deductive chain: Municipal Charter -> Treated -> Free of Deterioration -> Suitable for Display.

Anahtar Kavram

Sufficient Assumption Deductive Linkage
Tahmini Süre:45s
Soru 342Soru →

The Antiquarian Document Restoration Society enforces the following conservation protocols for illuminated manuscripts:

• Every fourteenth-century parchment manuscript undergoing aqueous pigment stabilization must first receive an infrared reflectography assessment.
• No document that receives an infrared reflectography assessment is approved for ultrasonic surface cleaning unless it has also been certified as having stable organic binders.
• The manuscript Codex Veridicus is a fourteenth-century parchment manuscript treated at the Guild Workshop, where it underwent aqueous pigment stabilization and was approved for ultrasonic surface cleaning.

Statement: Codex Veridicus was certified as having stable organic binders.

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: True

Cevap

True
The stimulus provides sufficient premises to prove the claim with certainty. Codex Veridicus meets the exact conditions that mandate an infrared reflectography assessment, and because it was subsequently approved for ultrasonic surface cleaning, it was required by the protocol to possess certification for stable organic binders.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Formalize the conditional premises stated in the conservation protocol.
Rule 1: (14th-century parchment AND aqueous stabilization) → infrared reflectography assessment. Rule 2: (Infrared reflectography assessment AND approved for ultrasonic cleaning) → certified stable organic binders.
Translating rules into strict logical relations allows for step-by-step deductive chaining without unwarranted assumptions.
2
Apply the factual details regarding Codex Veridicus to Rule 1.
Codex Veridicus meets both conditions for Rule 1 (it is a 14th-century parchment manuscript and underwent aqueous stabilization), so it definitely received an infrared reflectography assessment.
Modus ponens on Rule 1 establishes that Codex Veridicus received the infrared reflectography assessment.
3
Combine the result from Step 2 with the second factual premise to apply Rule 2.
Codex Veridicus received an infrared reflectography assessment AND was approved for ultrasonic surface cleaning. By Rule 2, it necessarily follows that Codex Veridicus was certified as having stable organic binders.
Applying the conjunction of the two conditions to Rule 2 strictly yields the necessary requirement of certification.

Anahtar Kavram

Deductive conditional chaining and necessary condition satisfaction in formal logic
Tahmini Süre:1m 15s
Soru 343Soru →

Financial Analyst: For a startup tech enterprise to secure institutional Series B venture funding, it is imperative that its net recurring revenue has expanded by at least 100 percent annually over the preceding two fiscal quarters. Furthermore, any firm that manages to expand its recurring revenue at such a rapid pace must possess proprietary intellectual property that creates substantial barriers to market entry. Therefore, because CloudSphere Technologies holds several patented software algorithms that prevent competitors from entering its market space, CloudSphere will inevitably obtain Series B funding in the coming round.

The financial analyst's reasoning is most vulnerable to criticism on the grounds that the argument

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: treats a condition that is necessary for securing funding as though it were sufficient to guarantee that funding

Cevap

The argument commits a conditional reasoning error by treating a necessary condition for obtaining funding as a sufficient condition that guarantees funding.
The correct response accurately captures the structural error in the argument: the premises demonstrate that proprietary intellectual property is an indispensable requirement (necessary condition) for Series B funding, but the author fallaciously infers that meeting this requirement ensures that the funding will be received (treating it as a sufficient condition).

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Analyze the formal conditional structure of the premises
Premise 1 establishes: Securing Series B funding →\rightarrow Rapid revenue growth (≥100%\ge 100\%). Premise 2 establishes: Rapid revenue growth →\rightarrow Proprietary intellectual property. Combining these yields the conditional requirement: Securing Series B funding →\rightarrow Proprietary intellectual property.
Deconstructing conditional relationships into formal logic exposes the necessary prerequisites for the outcome.
2
Examine the relationship between the premises and the conclusion
The analyst observes that CloudSphere satisfies the final necessary condition (holding proprietary intellectual property) and infers that CloudSphere must achieve the initial condition (securing Series B funding).
This establishes that the author asserts B→AB \rightarrow A based solely on the conditional rule A→BA \rightarrow B.
3
Identify the logical flaw
The argument commits a classic Mistaken Reversal (confusing necessity with sufficiency), falsely assuming that meeting an essential requirement is enough to guarantee the end result.
Matching the structural gap between premise and conclusion identifies the exact logical vulnerability.

Anahtar Kavram

Mistaken Reversal / Confusing Necessary and Sufficient Conditions
Tahmini Süre:1m 30s
Soru 344Soru →

Paleoecologist: Fossilized tooth enamel from dwarf hippopotamuses on the island of Minoria shows a sharp increase in micro-wear scratches and carbon-13 isotope levels dating to 12,000 years ago. Because this change coincides with the earliest archaeological evidence of human arrival on Minoria, and carbon-13 enrichment indicates the consumption of tough coastal scrub rather than lush inland vegetation, researchers conclude that hunting pressure from human arrivals forced the hippopotamuses from their inland forest habitats into marginal coastal zones, leading to their extinction.

Which of the following statements, if true, most seriously undermine the paleoecologist's argument? (Select all that apply.)

Geçerli olan tümünü seçin

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: Sediment core data from Minoria show that an island-wide megadrought occurred 12,000 years ago, severely desiccating inland freshwater sources and wiping out the island's inland forest vegetation.; Fossilized dwarf hippopotamus remains recovered from inland caves on Minoria demonstrate elevated carbon-13 levels and identical micro-wear patterns dating to several hundred years before the earliest human arrival.

Cevap

The statements that undermine the argument are the finding that an island-wide megadrought destroyed inland forests 12,000 years ago and the finding that the dietary shift occurred centuries prior to human arrival.
Both correct choices directly sever the proposed causal connection. One provides an alternative environmental cause (an island-wide drought that destroyed inland forests), showing that the dietary shift was driven by climatic destruction rather than human hunting pressure. The other demonstrates that the dietary shift occurred centuries before human arrival, showing that the phenomenon existed independently of any human presence.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Identify the argument's premises and main conclusion
Premises: Minoria dwarf hippo enamel displays elevated carbon-13 and micro-wear at 12,000 BP (indicating a diet of coastal scrub), coinciding with human arrival. Conclusion: Human hunting pressure forced the hippos out of inland forests to coastal zones, causing extinction.
Deconstructing the argument isolates the causal leap from temporal correlation to human-induced displacement.
2
Determine the underlying causal assumptions and vulnerabilities
The author assumes human arrival caused the habitat displacement rather than an alternative environmental cause, and assumes the dietary shift did not precede human arrival.
Causal arguments on the LSAT are vulnerable to alternative causes, reversed causation, and pre-existing conditions.
3
Evaluate the choices for valid weaken mechanisms
The drought statement provides an alternative explanation for the loss of inland vegetation, and the pre-human fossil statement destroys the temporal correlation by demonstrating the shift happened before humans arrived.
Both findings directly invalidate the author's causal inference.

Anahtar Kavram

Weaking causal arguments via alternative explanations and pre-existing timeline disproof
Tahmini Süre:2m 0s
Soru 345Soru →

Consider the following historical regulations established by the Grand Mint of Venice regarding precious metal coinage:

• Every gold ducat batch certified for overseas commerce underwent double cupellation refining.
• Any coinage batch subjected to double cupellation refining that also achieved a fineness rating above 0.995 was exempt from bullion remelt audits.
• No batch produced during the winter quarantine failed to achieve a fineness rating above 0.995.
• Some gold ducat batches produced during the winter quarantine were certified for overseas commerce.

Statement: Based on the records above, at least some gold ducat batches produced during the winter quarantine were exempt from bullion remelt audits.

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: True

Cevap

True. The deductive claim strictly follows from the conjunction of the conditional rules and the existential premise.
The statement must be true because the premises provide a closed deductive chain: the existential premise guarantees the existence of gold ducat batches produced during the winter quarantine that were certified for overseas commerce. Under the stated rules, overseas-certified gold ducats underwent double cupellation refining, and winter quarantine production guarantees a fineness rating above 0.995. Possessing both characteristics strictly triggers the exemption from bullion remelt audits, proving that at least some winter quarantine batches were exempt.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Identify the existential premise providing the starting subject.
There exists a non-empty set of gold ducat batches that were both produced during the winter quarantine and certified for overseas commerce.
Existential claims ('some') anchor deduction by establishing the actual existence of items possessing specific combined properties.
2
Apply the universal conditional rules to the identified batch subset.
For any batch in this subset: (1) Overseas certification guarantees double cupellation refining; (2) Winter quarantine production guarantees a fineness rating above 0.995.
Universal conditionals apply without exception to any member satisfying their respective antecedent conditions.
3
Synthesize the resulting properties against the rule for audit exemption.
Because these batches possess both double cupellation refining and a fineness rating above 0.995, they meet the joint sufficient condition for exemption from bullion remelt audits.
When all antecedent conditions of a compound conditional are met, the consequent must follow.
4
Evaluate the statement's truth value.
The statement that at least some gold ducat batches produced during the winter quarantine were exempt from remelt audits must be true.
The conclusion is derived with complete deductive certainty.

Anahtar Kavram

Quantifier Intersection and Compound Conditional Synthesis
Tahmini Süre:2m 0s
Soru 346Soru →

Analyze the three short argumentative excerpts on the left and the reasoning errors on the right. For each argument, determine its primary structural flaw and match the passage to its corresponding logical fallacy description.

Soldaki öğeye tıklayın, sonra eşleşen sağdaki öğeye tıklayın

Öğeler

Marine Biologist: Over the past five years, coastal regions where mangrove wetlands expanded also recorded a significant decline in reef fish mortality rates. Therefore, expanding mangrove coverage is what caused the mortality rates among reef fish to drop.
Software Engineer: Every individual algorithmic submodule in our new neural translation pipeline executes in under ten milliseconds. It follows that the complete pipeline will process an entire document in under ten milliseconds.
City Planner: The municipality must either approve the complete zoning overhaul of the historic warehouse district or face severe budget deficits within two years. Because running a deficit is unacceptable, we must enact the zoning overhaul.

Eşleşmeler

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap

The marine biology argument matches the description of inferring causation from correlation; the software engineering argument matches the description of attributing a property of individual parts to the whole; and the municipal planning argument matches the description of assuming an exhaustive false dilemma.
Each argumentative passage demonstrates a distinct and well-defined logical fallacy: the marine biology passage erroneously infers causation from correlation; the software engineering passage inappropriately generalizes from individual components to the entire system (composition); and the city planning passage improperly presents an unevidenced either/or dichotomy.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Analyze the first argument (marine biology) for reasoning vulnerabilities.
The premises state a concurrent correlation between mangrove expansion and lower fish mortality, and the conclusion claims a causal link. This is a classic correlation-to-causation error.
Establishing that two events occur together does not eliminate potential third variables or prove that one caused the other.
2
Analyze the second argument (software engineering) for structural fallacies.
The premise describes a characteristic of individual submodules, while the conclusion attributes that same timing limit to the aggregated document-processing operation. This is a part-to-whole (fallacy of composition) error.
The cumulative duration of multiple submodules executing in sequence or handling larger inputs can easily exceed the duration of an isolated submodule.
3
Analyze the third argument (city planning) for unjustified structural assumptions.
The planner limits the options to exactly two extremes (zoning overhaul or budget deficits) without proving that no alternative budgetary or zoning policies exist.
This commits a false dilemma by arbitrarily restricting the range of possible solutions.

Anahtar Kavram

Flaw in the Reasoning: Structural Fallacy Identification
Tahmini Süre:1m 30s
Soru 347Soru →

Match each short argument on the left with the additional premise on the right that most effectively strengthens its conclusion.

Soldaki öğeye tıklayın, sonra eşleşen sağdaki öğeye tıklayın

Öğeler

A local bakery began using organic stone-ground flour and saw a 30% rise in pastry sales over two months, concluding that customers prefer the flavor of stone-ground flour.
A community center introduced fifteen-minute morning stretching sessions and recorded improved punctuality among attendees, concluding that stretching directly motivates people to arrive on time.
A veterinary clinic began playing soft instrumental music in its lobby and reported fewer behavioral signs of anxiety in pets, concluding that the music pacified the animals.

Eşleşmeler

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap

Match the bakery argument with the premise ruling out pricing and marketing changes; match the community center argument with the premise ruling out transit and parking changes; and match the veterinary clinic argument with the premise establishing reduced anxiety specifically during active music playback.
Each correct pair matches an inductive causal conclusion with a supplementary fact that either eliminates alternative explanations (such as pricing/marketing for the bakery, or transit conditions for the community center) or demonstrates that the effect occurs when the cause is present and does not occur when the cause is absent (for the veterinary clinic).

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Identify the causal conclusion and unstated assumptions in each left-hand argument.
Each argument concludes that a specific intervention caused an observed improvement, assuming no unmentioned confounding variables or alternative explanations accounted for the change.
Strengthening a causal argument typically requires eliminating plausible alternative causes or demonstrating that the effect correlates directly with the presence of the cause.
2
Evaluate the right-hand options for evidence that controls for confounding variables or establishes covariation.
The statement holding bakery prices and advertising constant eliminates rival explanations for sales; the statement holding transit and parking constant eliminates rival explanations for punctuality; and the statement comparing music to silence shows direct covariation of cause and effect.
Matching each premise to its corresponding context links each specific gap to its appropriate validation.
3
Form the correct pairs based on matching each argumentative gap to its resolving evidence.
All three arguments are paired with statements that specifically support their respective causal conclusions.
Confirming each pair ensures precise alignment without cross-matching contexts.

Anahtar Kavram

Strengthening Causal Arguments by Ruling Out Confounding Variables and Demonstrating Covariation
Tahmini Süre:1m 0s
Soru 348Soru →

Market Analyst: A major supermarket chain tested an automated pricing system that dynamically discounts perishable food items as they approach their expiration dates. During a six-month trial across twenty suburban supermarkets, food waste from expired perishables dropped by 25 percent, while store profit margins increased. Because the automated discounts motivated consumers to purchase goods nearing expiration before they spoiled, the chain plans to deploy the system across all its urban supermarkets to achieve a similar reduction in perishable food waste.

Which one of the following is an assumption on which the market analyst's argument depends?

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: Consumers in urban grocery stores are not significantly less willing to purchase perishable food items nearing expiration at discounted prices than suburban consumers are.

Cevap

The argument depends on assuming that consumers in urban grocery stores are not significantly less willing to purchase perishable food items nearing expiration at discounted prices than suburban consumers are.
The conclusion states that implementing dynamic pricing across urban supermarkets will achieve a similar reduction in perishable food waste to that observed in suburban supermarkets. The stated mechanism for this reduction is that price discounts motivated shoppers to buy items nearing expiration. For this causal mechanism to work in urban stores, urban shoppers must be similarly receptive to purchasing discounted near-expiration goods. If urban shoppers are significantly less willing to purchase such items, the discount mechanism will fail to stimulate demand, preventing the reduction in waste. Therefore, the argument strictly requires assuming that urban shoppers are not significantly less willing to buy these items.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Identify the conclusion and the supporting premises in the stimulus.
Premise: Automated discounting reduced perishable food waste by 25 percent in suburban stores because discounts incentivized purchases before expiration. Conclusion: Deploying the system in urban stores will achieve a similar reduction in perishable food waste.
Clarifying the premise-to-conclusion transition highlights the underlying assumption needed to generalize findings from suburban to urban stores.
2
Identify the logical leap between the experimental group and the target rollout group.
The author assumes that the behavioral incentive (price discounts motivating the purchase of near-expiration food) will function with comparable efficacy in urban stores.
An unstated connection must exist to guarantee that urban shoppers will respond to the discounts similarly to suburban shoppers.
3
Apply the Negation Test to confirm necessity.
Negating the statement: 'Consumers in urban grocery stores ARE significantly less willing to purchase perishable food items nearing expiration at discounted prices.' If true, urban consumers will not buy the discounted items, preventing the expected reduction in food waste and collapsing the conclusion.
A required assumption must be essential such that its logical negation destroys the argument's conclusion.

Anahtar Kavram

Necessary Assumption (Extrapolating Sample Results and Applying the Negation Test)

Alternatif Yöntem

Negation Technique: Transform each candidate answer into its logical opposite. If negating a statement leaves the argument's conclusion viable, that statement is not a necessary assumption. The only statement whose negation makes the conclusion untenable is the required assumption.
Tahmini Süre:1m 15s
Soru 349Soru →

Traffic Safety Analyst: In an effort to reduce nighttime pedestrian collisions, the city of Bellview recently installed high-contrast reflective crosswalks at fifty major intersections. Over the subsequent six months, nighttime pedestrian collisions at these intersections decreased by twenty percent relative to the previous six months. Because no other roadway modifications were made at these intersections during this period, the new reflective crosswalks clearly caused the reduction in collisions by making pedestrians more visible to drivers.

Which one of the following, if true, most seriously undermines the traffic safety analyst's argument?

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: Shortly before the crosswalks were installed, a nearby bridge closure permanently diverted over one-third of nighttime vehicular traffic away from the streets containing the fifty intersections.

Cevap

The argument is most seriously weakened by demonstrating that a major bridge closure diverted over one-third of nighttime vehicular traffic away from the intersections, providing an alternate explanation for the collision reduction.
The analyst concludes that the crosswalk paint caused the reduction in pedestrian accidents by improving visibility. The statement detailing a major bridge closure that diverted over one-third of nighttime vehicular traffic away from these intersections directly undermines this conclusion by providing an obvious alternative explanation: with fewer cars on the road, collisions decreased regardless of driver visibility.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Identify the premises and the main conclusion of the argument.
Premises: 50 intersections received reflective crosswalks, nighttime pedestrian collisions dropped 20% over six months, and no other road modifications occurred. Conclusion: The reflective crosswalks caused the reduction in collisions by increasing visibility.
Isolating the core causal claim is essential for identifying the logical gap.
2
Identify the unstated assumption linking the correlation to causation.
The author assumes that no other external factor (such as changes in traffic volume or pedestrian density) was responsible for the decline in nighttime collisions.
Causal arguments on the LSAT frequently overlook alternate causes or confounding variables.
3
Select the choice that provides an alternative explanation for the 20% decline in nighttime collisions.
A substantial diversion of nighttime traffic due to a bridge closure explains why fewer collisions occurred, independently of whether the crosswalks improved visibility.
Introducing an alternate cause breaks the inferred link between the reflective paint and the reduction in accidents.

Anahtar Kavram

Evaluating Alternate Explanations in Causal Arguments
Soru 350Soru →

The faculty senate at a research university recently adopted new bylaws governing research funding. The bylaws stipulate that any grant proposal involving human subjects must be reviewed by the ethics board unless the proposal is exclusively funded by an internal departmental budget. Furthermore, no proposal that is reviewed by the ethics board can be approved for expedited processing. Every proposal that is exclusively funded by an internal departmental budget is exempt from the standard peer-review process.

Based on these bylaws, it must be true that if a grant proposal involving human subjects is approved for expedited processing, it is exempt from the standard peer-review process.

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: True

Cevap

True
The statement is logically guaranteed by chaining the contrapositive of the expedited processing rule through the 'unless' exception of the human subjects rule, ultimately triggering the peer-review exemption.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Translate the premises into formal conditional statements.
Premise 1: Human Subjects → (Ethics Board OR Exclusively Internal). Premise 2: Ethics Board → NOT Expedited. Premise 3: Exclusively Internal → Exempt from Peer Review.
Formalizing the rules prevents misinterpretation of complex logical operators, particularly the word 'unless'.
2
Analyze the conditions provided in the statement to be evaluated.
The statement proposes a specific scenario: a grant proposal has both Human Subjects (HS) and Expedited Processing (EXP).
These act as sufficient conditions from which we must derive the necessary outcome to test the statement.
3
Apply the contrapositive of Premise 2 to the Expedited condition.
Premise 2 states: Ethics Board → NOT Expedited. The contrapositive is: Expedited → NOT Ethics Board. Therefore, this proposal was NOT reviewed by the Ethics Board.
We must follow the logical chain backward from the known outcome (Expedited Processing).
4
Evaluate Premise 1 using the deduced information.
Premise 1 requires Human Subjects proposals to go to the Ethics Board UNLESS they are Exclusively Internal. Since our proposal bypassed the Ethics Board, it must trigger the exception: it is Exclusively Internal.
In a necessary condition involving a disjunction (A or B), if one option (A) is eliminated, the other (B) must be true.
5
Apply the deduction from Step 4 to Premise 3.
Since the proposal is Exclusively Internal, Premise 3 dictates it is Exempt from Peer Review. This matches the outcome predicted by the statement perfectly.
This completes the logical chain from the initial conditions to the required outcome, proving the statement must be true.

Anahtar Kavram

Formal Logic, Conditional Chaining, and Contrapositives
Soru 351Soru →

In mammalian cellular physiology, any cell undergoing mitochondrial autophagy activates the Parkin-dependent ubiquitination pathway unless it has sustained severe disruption of its inner membrane electrochemical gradient. Every cell that activates the Parkin-dependent ubiquitination pathway produces elevated levels of phosphorylated ubiquitin. Furthermore, any cell that exhibits lysosomal membrane permeabilization suffers severe disruption of its inner membrane electrochemical gradient, and no cell producing elevated levels of phosphorylated ubiquitin can initiate caspase-independent apoptosis.

If the statements above are true, which one of the following must also be true?

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: Any cell undergoing mitochondrial autophagy that initiates caspase-independent apoptosis has sustained severe disruption of its inner membrane electrochemical gradient.

Cevap

Any cell undergoing mitochondrial autophagy that initiates caspase-independent apoptosis has sustained severe disruption of its inner membrane electrochemical gradient.
The stimulus establishes a strict conditional chain: if a cell undergoes mitochondrial autophagy and lacks severe inner membrane electrochemical gradient disruption, it must activate the Parkin-dependent ubiquitination pathway, which in turn guarantees elevated phosphorylated ubiquitin, thereby precluding caspase-independent apoptosis. Via contrapositive deduction, any cell that initiates caspase-independent apoptosis cannot satisfy both initial conditions; therefore, if such a cell is indeed undergoing mitochondrial autophagy, it must have sustained severe disruption of its inner membrane electrochemical gradient.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Formalize the conditional statements and exception rules in the stimulus.
Autophagy AND (No Gradient Disruption) implies Parkin Activation; Parkin Activation implies Elevated Phosphorylated Ubiquitin; Elevated Phosphorylated Ubiquitin implies No Caspase-Independent Apoptosis.
Translating the prose into structured conditional links clarifies the logical pathway and reveals the trigger conditions.
2
Chain the valid implications to form a composite deductive rule.
(Autophagy AND No Gradient Disruption) implies No Caspase-Independent Apoptosis.
Transitive linking across the intermediate terms (Parkin Activation and Phosphorylated Ubiquitin) connects the starting physiological states directly to the terminal apoptotic consequence.
3
Derive the contrapositive of the composite conditional statement.
If a cell initiates Caspase-Independent Apoptosis, it is NOT the case that (Autophagy AND No Gradient Disruption). For a cell that is undergoing Autophagy, it MUST have sustained Severe Gradient Disruption.
The contrapositive of any valid conditional statement is logically equivalent and necessarily true.

Anahtar Kavram

Deductive Conditional Chaining and Contrapositive Synthesis
Tahmini Süre:2m 0s
Soru 352Soru →

Botanist: In order for heirloom tomato cultivars to develop high concentrations of flavor-enhancing aromatic esters, the soil in which they are grown must contain a specific balance of mycorrhizal fungi. Recent field assays confirm that the soil throughout our experimental greenhouse plots contains precisely this requisite balance of mycorrhizal fungi. Thus, we can conclude that the heirloom tomatoes grown in these greenhouse plots will inevitably yield high concentrations of flavor-enhancing aromatic esters.

Which one of the following most accurately describes a flaw in the botanist's reasoning?

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: treats a condition that is necessary for producing a specific outcome as though it were sufficient to guarantee that outcome

Cevap

The botanist's argument is flawed because it treats a condition that is required (necessary) for the development of high aromatic ester concentrations as if it were sufficient to guarantee that outcome.
The botanist establishes that the specific balance of mycorrhizal fungi is a necessary condition for heirloom cultivars to develop high aromatic ester concentrations, indicated by the indicator phrase 'in order for... the soil... must contain'. The second premise confirms that this necessary condition has been satisfied in the greenhouse plots. From this, the botanist concludes that the tomatoes will inevitably develop high ester concentrations. This inference is logically invalid because meeting a necessary condition does not guarantee the outcome; other necessary factors might be missing. The argument commits the classic formal flaw of confusing a necessary condition with a sufficient condition.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Analyze the conditional relationship in the first premise
High ester concentrations require a specific mycorrhizal fungal balance (Ester Development → Fungal Balance).
The phrase 'in order for... must contain' introduces a necessary condition.
2
Analyze the factual evidence and the conclusion drawn
The premise confirms the presence of the fungal balance; the conclusion asserts that high ester concentrations will definitely occur.
The botanist attempts to deduce the sufficient condition from the presence of the necessary condition (affirming the consequent).
3
Identify the structural reasoning error
Confusing a necessary condition with a sufficient condition.
Having the required soil fungi does not preclude other requirements (such as light, water, or temperature) from failing to be met.

Anahtar Kavram

Identifying Conditional Reasoning Flaws (Mistaking Necessary for Sufficient)
Tahmini Süre:1m 15s
Soru 353Soru →

Archaeologist: Microscopic analysis of dental calculus from Bronze Age human remains excavated at a high-altitude settlement in the Tian Shan mountains revealed starch granules from cultivated broomcorn millet. Because wild millet cannot grow at these elevations and historical linguistic models indicate that local populations lacked farming terminology until centuries later, the excavators concluded that these highlanders obtained all their millet through trade with distant lowland farming societies.

Which of the following statements, if true, most seriously undermine the excavators' conclusion? (Select all that apply.)

Geçerli olan tümünü seçin

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: Strontium isotope analyses of the skeletal remains indicate that these individuals spent their childhood and early adulthood in lowland farming settlements before moving to the high-altitude site.; Microclimate analysis and soil cores from the mountain settlement demonstrate that sheltered micro-basins supported the opportunistic seasonal cultivation of early-maturing millet without specialized agricultural techniques.

Cevap

The statements indicating that the individuals lived in lowland farming settlements prior to migrating to the mountain site, and that sheltered micro-basins at the site supported local cultivation of early-maturing millet, both undermine the conclusion.
Both correct statements introduce new evidence that directly challenges the author's inferential leaps: one establishes an alternative explanation for the dental calculus (that individuals ate millet while living in the lowlands before migrating to the highlands), and the other establishes that local cultivation was environmentally feasible in micro-basins despite the general regional elevation constraints and the absence of specialized agricultural vocabulary.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Analyze the stimulus argument to isolate premises and the main conclusion.
Premises: Starch granules of broomcorn millet were identified in dental calculus from high-altitude human remains; wild millet cannot grow at high altitudes; linguistic reconstructions show no farming vocabulary until centuries later. Conclusion: Highlanders acquired all their millet via trade with distant lowland farmers.
Deconstructing the argument isolates the inferential gap between physical evidence of consumption and the claim of trade dependency.
2
Identify unstated assumptions and reasoning vulnerabilities.
The author assumes that calculus deposits reflect dietary intake solely during residence at the high-altitude site, that lack of formal farming vocabulary precludes all local cultivation, and that trade is the sole possible mechanism.
Uncovering implicit assumptions highlights how alternative explanations sever the link between premises and conclusion.
3
Evaluate each statement to determine whether it provides counter-evidence against the conclusion.
The statement showing prior lowland residence provides an alternative origin for the dental deposits (migration), and the statement showing micro-basin cultivation provides an alternative origin for the crop (local growing), both undermining the conclusion.
Multi-select weaken questions require identifying all independent choices that undermine the argument's central claim.

Anahtar Kavram

Weaken Arguments via Alternative Explanations and Unstated Assumptions
Tahmini Süre:2m 0s
Soru 354Soru →

Environmental Economist: Over the past five years, the municipality of Ardenville replaced flat-rate residential electricity tariffs with a dynamic time-of-use pricing structure, under which peak-hour electricity rates quadrupled while off-peak rates were discounted. Municipal records show that overall peak-hour residential electricity demand declined by 18 percent over this period. Critics argue that this reduction was merely an artifact of milder summer temperatures rather than behavioral shifts. However, during these same five years, neighboring municipalities with identical weather patterns and standard flat-rate pricing experienced a 4 percent increase in peak-hour residential electricity consumption. Therefore, Ardenville's dynamic pricing policy was indeed effective in motivating residents to shift their discretionary electricity usage to off-peak hours.

Which of the following are unstated assumptions on which the environmental economist's argument depends? Select all that apply.

Geçerli olan tümünü seçin

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: The reduction in Ardenville's peak-hour electricity consumption was not achieved entirely through the permanent elimination of discretionary energy use rather than its rescheduling.; The decline in peak-hour residential electricity consumption in Ardenville was not primarily attributable to a net decrease in the municipality's residential population over the five-year period.

Cevap

The argument depends on the assumption that the reduction was not achieved entirely through permanent elimination of energy use rather than rescheduling, and the assumption that the decline was not primarily attributable to a net decrease in residential population.
Both required assumptions must be true for the conclusion to hold. The statement ensuring that the reduction was not achieved entirely through permanent elimination of discretionary energy use is a supporter assumption that validates the conclusion's specific claim of usage being shifted to off-peak hours rather than abandoned altogether. The statement ensuring that the decline was not primarily driven by a drop in residential population is a defender assumption that protects the causal link between the pricing policy and the aggregate demand reduction.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Isolate the argument's premises and main conclusion.
Premises: Ardenville's peak electricity demand dropped 18% after implementing dynamic pricing; neighboring cities with identical weather but flat rates saw a 4% increase. Conclusion: Dynamic pricing was effective in motivating residents to shift discretionary electricity usage to off-peak hours.
Identifying the exact scope of the conclusion is necessary to determine what unstated premises are logically required.
2
Identify structural gaps between the evidence and the specific claim in the conclusion.
Gap 1 (Supporter): The evidence shows a reduction in peak-hour usage, but the conclusion specifically asserts a 'shift' of usage to off-peak hours. Gap 2 (Defender): The evidence assumes the 18% drop represents per-capita behavioral changes rather than demographic decline or population loss.
Necessary assumptions must bridge conceptual leaps or defend against alternative causal explanations.
3
Apply the Negation Test to candidate statements.
Negating the statement regarding permanent elimination means all peak-hour reductions were pure curtailments with zero shift to off-peak hours, directly destroying the conclusion. Negating the population statement means the reduction was merely an artifact of population shrinkage, destroying the causal link to the policy.
A statement is a necessary assumption if and only if its logical negation fatally undermines the argument.

Anahtar Kavram

Necessary Assumption in Logical Reasoning
Tahmini Süre:2m 0s
Soru 355Soru →

Ecologist: Over the past five years, the population of the western bog fritillary butterfly in the Merrow Valley wetlands has declined by 40 percent. During this same period, agricultural drainage projects in adjacent uplands substantially lowered the local water table, which in turn reduced the abundance of marsh violet, the fritillary caterpillar's sole larval food source. Although adult fritillaries can disperse several kilometers across open terrain, the hypothesis that the population simply relocated to nearby unmonitored wetlands is incorrect; the decline in the Merrow Valley represents an actual net loss of fritillary individuals rather than a migration.

Which of the following are assumptions on which the ecologist's argument depends? (Select all that apply.)

Geçerli olan tümünü seçin

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: The fritillaries that disappeared from the Merrow Valley did not successfully establish or augment breeding populations in unmonitored wetlands in the region.; The observed 40 percent drop in the Merrow Valley fritillary population was not matched by an equivalent increase in the fritillary population across nearby unmonitored wetlands.

Cevap

The argument depends on the assumptions that the displaced butterflies did not successfully establish or augment breeding populations in unmonitored wetlands, and that the decline in the surveyed valley was not matched by an equivalent population increase in those unmonitored wetlands.
The conclusion explicitly denies the relocation hypothesis, asserting that the local decline represents a net loss of individuals. For this reasoning to hold, it is strictly necessary that the butterflies did not simply move to unmonitored areas and thrive there. Both the option stating that the butterflies did not successfully establish or augment breeding populations in unmonitored wetlands and the option stating that the drop was not matched by an equivalent increase elsewhere are required; negating either statement directly proves that relocation occurred, fatally undermining the ecologist's conclusion.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Analyze the argument's structure and identify premises and conclusion.
Premise 1: Merrow Valley fritillary population declined by 40% over 5 years. Premise 2: Drainage lowered the water table, reducing marsh violet (sole larval food source). Counter-premise noted: Adult butterflies can disperse several kilometers. Conclusion: The decline represents a true net loss of individuals, not a relocation/migration to unmonitored wetlands.
Isolating the gap between the observed local decline and the claim of overall net loss is essential to determining what must be assumed.
2
Formulate the essential logical bridge (Supporter/Defender role).
To conclude that the decline is an actual net loss rather than a migration, the author must rule out the possibility that the missing butterflies successfully relocated, survived, and reproduced in unmonitored areas.
A necessary assumption must protect the conclusion from the unmonitored relocation counter-hypothesis.
3
Apply the Negation Test to each option.
Negating the statement about butterflies establishing breeding populations in unmonitored wetlands proves the relocation hypothesis true, destroying the author's claim. Negating the statement about the lack of an equivalent numerical increase in unmonitored wetlands shows total numbers remained constant, also destroying the conclusion. Negating the remaining statements leaves the core conclusion intact.
A required unstated assumption, when negated, must completely invalidate the author's conclusion.

Anahtar Kavram

Necessary Assumption (Defender Assumption and Negation Technique)
Tahmini Süre:1m 30s
Soru 356Soru →

Ecologists studying alpine plant communities in the Cascade Range recorded the following observations regarding high-altitude perennial species:

• Every perennial species that produces anthocyanin-rich floral pigments possesses cellular cold-shock proteins.
• Any species possessing cellular cold-shock proteins is capable of surviving prolonged sub-zero temperatures without tissue necrosis.
• Some alpine perennial species that are pollinated exclusively by bumblebees produce anthocyanin-rich floral pigments.
• No species capable of surviving prolonged sub-zero temperatures without tissue necrosis exhibits early-spring dormancy.

Based on the ecologists' observations, which of the following statements must be true? (Select all that apply.)

Geçerli olan tümünü seçin

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: At least some alpine perennial species that are pollinated exclusively by bumblebees are capable of surviving prolonged sub-zero temperatures without tissue necrosis.; No alpine perennial species that exhibits early-spring dormancy produces anthocyanin-rich floral pigments.

Cevap

The statements that must be true are the one asserting that at least some bumblebee-pollinated alpine perennials can survive prolonged sub-zero temperatures without tissue necrosis, and the one stating that no species exhibiting early-spring dormancy produces anthocyanin-rich floral pigments.
The statements asserting sub-zero survival for some bumblebee-pollinated species and the absence of anthocyanin production in dormant species are deductively guaranteed. First, because some bumblebee-pollinated perennials produce anthocyanin, and all anthocyanin producers possess cold-shock proteins that confer sub-zero survival without necrosis, at least some bumblebee-pollinated perennials must possess this survival capacity. Second, the full conditional chain shows that every anthocyanin-producing species avoids early-spring dormancy; taking the contrapositive confirms that no species with early-spring dormancy can produce anthocyanin.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Formalize the conditional rules and quantifier relationships from the stimulus.
Anthocyanin →\rightarrow Cold-shock proteins →\rightarrow Sub-zero survival without necrosis →\rightarrow No early-spring dormancy. Additionally: Some Bumblebee-pollinated →\rightarrow Anthocyanin.
Translating premises into symbolic logic clarifies valid inferences, quantifier overlaps, and contrapositives.
2
Chain the quantifier premise through the conditional sequence.
Since some bumblebee-pollinated species produce anthocyanins, and all anthocyanin producers possess cold-shock proteins and survive sub-zero temperatures, there exist bumblebee-pollinated species with sub-zero survival capability.
An existential quantifier (Some XX are YY) combined with universal conditionals (Y→ZY \rightarrow Z) guarantees that Some XX are ZZ.
3
Derive the contrapositive of the full conditional chain.
The conditional chain Anthocyanin →\rightarrow No early-spring dormancy yields the contrapositive: Early-spring dormancy →\rightarrow No anthocyanin.
A conditional statement is logically equivalent to its contrapositive, establishing that any plant with early-spring dormancy cannot produce anthocyanins.

Anahtar Kavram

Conditional chaining, contrapositive derivation, and quantifier intersection in deductive logic
Tahmini Süre:1m 30s
Soru 357Soru →

Consider the following argument:

Marine Biologist: Deep-sea coral reefs off the southern Reykjanes Ridge experienced a 30 percent decline in skeletal calcification rates following a series of localized undersea seismic tremors. Because such tremors fracture hydrothermal fissures, releasing acidic mineral compounds into surrounding waters, researchers concluded that the increased acidity from these venting fissures was the direct cause of the diminished calcification in the coral colonies.

Statement: If true, the fact that the undersea tremors also triggered dense submarine sediment plumes that settled over the reefs and obstructed the nutrient filtration required for calcification weakens the researchers' conclusion.

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: True

Cevap

True
The statement is true because the stimulus commits a classic correlation-to-causation error. The author assumes that because calcification dropped following seismic activity, the acidic compounds released by the tremors must be the direct cause. Introducing evidence that the tremors concurrently created sediment plumes that physically impede the biological mechanism of calcification provides an alternative explanation for the decline, substantially weakening the author's conclusion.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Identify the conclusion and supporting premises in the stimulus.
Conclusion: The increased acidity from venting fissures was the direct cause of the diminished coral calcification. Premise: A 30 percent calcification decline occurred after seismic tremors, which are known to fracture fissures and release acidic mineral compounds.
Accurately identifying the author's causal claim is necessary to determine what evidence would weaken it.
2
Identify the underlying reasoning gap in the argument.
The author assumes that because tremors release acidity and calcification subsequently declined, the acidity must be the specific factor responsible, overlooking other potential consequences of the tremors.
Causal arguments that infer causation from temporal correlation are vulnerable to plausible alternative explanations for the observed effect.
3
Evaluate whether the statement introduces an effective alternative cause.
The statement introduces a competing causal mechanism—sediment plumes caused by the same tremors that directly obstruct calcification—which accounts for the effect without relying on water acidity.
Providing a viable alternative cause directly undermines the claim that acidity was the direct cause, confirming that the statement weakens the conclusion.

Anahtar Kavram

Weakening causal arguments by introducing an alternative explanation for an observed correlation
Soru 358Soru →

Geochemists studying paleoclimate records in subterranean cave formations have established the following premises:

• Every stalagmite specimen from the Hanlin formation that preserves intact lipid biomarkers exhibits depleted δ18O\delta^{18}\text{O} isotopic ratios.
• Any stalagmite specimen from this formation that has undergone calcite recrystallization fails to preserve intact lipid biomarkers.
• A stalagmite specimen exhibits depleted δ18O\delta^{18}\text{O} isotopic ratios only if it formed during an era of elevated precipitation.
• Analysis of Hanlin specimen H-4 confirms that it preserves intact lipid biomarkers.

If the statements above are true, which one of the following must be true on the basis of them?

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: Hanlin specimen H-4 formed during an era of elevated precipitation.

Cevap

Hanlin specimen H-4 formed during an era of elevated precipitation.
The stimulus provides a direct deductive chain. We are told that Hanlin specimen H-4 possesses intact lipid biomarkers. According to the first premise, any specimen with intact lipid biomarkers exhibits depleted δ18O\delta^{18}\text{O} isotopic ratios. According to the third premise, exhibiting depleted δ18O\delta^{18}\text{O} isotopic ratios occurs 'only if' the specimen formed during an era of elevated precipitation, meaning that elevated precipitation is a necessary condition for depleted ratios. Chaining these validly (L→D→PL \rightarrow D \rightarrow P) proves conclusively that specimen H-4 must have formed during an era of elevated precipitation.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Translate the conditional rules and specific factual premise from the stimulus into formal logical statements.
Let LL = preserves intact lipid biomarkers, DD = exhibits depleted δ18O\delta^{18}\text{O} isotopic ratios, RR = undergone calcite recrystallization, and PP = formed during an era of elevated precipitation. The premises establish: (1) L→DL \rightarrow D, (2) R→¬LR \rightarrow \neg L (or L→¬RL \rightarrow \neg R), (3) D→PD \rightarrow P ('DD only if PP'), and (4) Fact: L(H-4)L(\text{H-4}) is true.
Formalizing the statements eliminates ambiguity regarding sufficient and necessary indicators such as 'every', 'any', and 'only if'.
2
Chain the conditional relationships starting from the known factual premise regarding specimen H-4.
From L(H-4)L(\text{H-4}) and rule (1) L→DL \rightarrow D, we deduce D(H-4)D(\text{H-4}). From D(H-4)D(\text{H-4}) and rule (3) D→PD \rightarrow P, we deduce P(H-4)P(\text{H-4}).
Applying modus ponens across the valid transitive chain L→D→PL \rightarrow D \rightarrow P yields the deductively guaranteed conclusion that H-4 formed during an era of elevated precipitation.
3
Evaluate the remaining options to confirm they either represent invalid formal fallacies or introduce unwarranted assumptions.
All alternative options commit classic logical errors such as conditional reversal, mistaken negation, or conflating sufficient conditions with exclusive causes.
Ensures that exactly one option is logically guaranteed by the premises.

Anahtar Kavram

Conditional Logic Chaining and Valid Deductive Inferences
Tahmini Süre:1m 15s
Soru 359Soru →

Match each paradoxical scenario with the underlying causal mechanism that most effectively resolves its apparent discrepancy.

Soldaki öğeye tıklayın, sonra eşleşen sağdaki öğeye tıklayın

Öğeler

A municipal transit agency lowered bus fares across all routes during peak hours, yet overall daily passenger volume decreased noticeably.
An independent bookstore reported a 30 percent surge in customer foot traffic this month, yet total book sales revenue dropped compared to last month.
A manufacturer installed high-speed automated packaging machinery to boost production, but the total number of finished units shipped per week declined.

Eşleşmeler

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap

Match the municipal transit scenario with the mechanism regarding commuter perception and service substitution; match the bookstore scenario with the mechanism regarding non-purchasing workshop attendees; match the manufacturing scenario with the mechanism regarding downstream sorting bottlenecks.
Each correct pairing provides a specific causal factor—consumer perception driving substitution, non-buying visitor demographics, or downstream process bottlenecks—that allows both observed facts in each scenario to be simultaneously true.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Identify the core discrepancy in each scenario on the left
Scenario 1 contrasts lower bus fares with decreased passenger volume; Scenario 2 contrasts higher bookstore foot traffic with lower sales revenue; Scenario 3 contrasts faster automated machinery with fewer shipped finished units.
Resolving a paradox requires isolating the two conflicting facts that must both remain true.
2
Evaluate the causal mechanisms on the right to identify the auxiliary fact that bridges both sides of each discrepancy
Consumer quality perception explains the transit ridership drop; non-purchasing workshop visitors explain the bookstore revenue gap; downstream packaging bottlenecks explain the net shipping reduction.
A valid resolution provides an underlying causal factor that allows both premises to coexist without denying either fact.
3
Pair each scenario with its corresponding explanatory mechanism
All three pairs are successfully matched based on their distinct causal resolutions.
Each scenario addresses a unique domain (consumer behavior, customer composition, and logistical bottlenecks).

Anahtar Kavram

Reconciling apparent paradoxes by introducing an unstated causal link or mediating variable that allows two contradictory facts to coexist.
Tahmini Süre:1m 0s
Soru 360Soru →

An epigrapher examining monumental inscriptions from an ancient provincial capital established the following criteria regarding the city's recovered public decrees:

• Any decree inscribed on basalt was commissioned directly by the royal court unless it was an agricultural land transfer.
• No decree commissioned directly by the royal court contains dialectical idioms from the northern hill country.
• Some decrees containing dialectical idioms from the northern hill country bear the personal seal of the city governor.
• All agricultural land transfers bear the personal seal of the city governor.

If the epigrapher's statements are true, which of the following statements must also be true?

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: Any decree inscribed on basalt that contains dialectical idioms from the northern hill country is an agricultural land transfer.

Cevap

Any decree inscribed on basalt that contains dialectical idioms from the northern hill country is an agricultural land transfer.
According to the premises, any inscription on basalt is a royal commission unless it is an agricultural land transfer, which is logically equivalent to stating that if a basalt inscription is not a royal commission, it must be an agricultural transfer. The second premise establishes that royal commissions never contain northern hill country idioms; thus, by contraposition, any inscription containing northern idioms is not a royal commission. Therefore, any inscription that is on basalt and contains northern idioms cannot be a royal commission and must be an agricultural land transfer.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Formalize the conditional relationships stated in the stimulus.
Basalt AND NOT Agricultural Transfer implies Royal Commission; Royal Commission implies NOT Northern Idiom (contrapositive: Northern Idiom implies NOT Royal Commission); Some Northern Idiom have Governor Seal; Agricultural Transfer implies Governor Seal.
Translating multi-premise arguments into symbolic conditional logic prevents reasoning errors.
2
Synthesize the conditions for a decree that is both on basalt and contains northern hill country idioms.
Having northern idioms strictly guarantees that the decree is NOT a royal commission. Applying this to the first premise (Basalt AND NOT Royal Commission implies Agricultural Transfer), the decree must be an agricultural land transfer.
Chaining the contrapositive of the second premise into the conditional exception of the first premise yields a deductively valid conclusion.
3
Evaluate the answer choices to locate this direct logical deduction.
The statement asserting that any basalt decree containing northern idioms is an agricultural transfer matches the deduction exactly.
Must Be True questions require a choice that is logically guaranteed by the premises without external assumptions.

Anahtar Kavram

Deductive Conditional Chaining and Contrapositive Synthesis
ÖncekiSayfa 18 / 34Sonraki
Logical Reasoning Alıştırma Soruları — LSAT — Sayfa 18 | Examkin