Logical Reasoning

666 soru

Soru 461Soru →

Consider the following argument from an evolutionary anthropologist:

Many researchers claim that the transition of early hominins to persistence hunting was driven primarily by mechanical improvements in bipedal gait efficiency. However, biomechanical reconstructions demonstrate that bipedal locomotion offers minimal metabolic savings over quadrupedal prey during sustained chases. Instead, specialized thermoregulatory adaptations—namely, dense eccrine sweat glands and cranial venous networks—enabled hominins to shed heat continuously during pursuits, whereas ungulates quickly suffer hyperthermia. Consequently, hominins achieved their pursuit advantage through superior thermoregulation rather than locomotive mechanics, proving that physiological cooling capacity was the primary evolutionary catalyst for persistence hunting.

Arrange the statements below to reflect the logical progression of the argument, starting from the premise refuting the competing hypothesis (1), moving to the supporting physiological premise (2), followed by the intermediate conclusion (3), and culminating in the author's ultimate main conclusion (4).

Öğeleri doğru sıraya koymak için sürükleyin

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap

The argument progresses logically from the premise refuting bipedal gait efficiency, to the premise detailing eccrine heat dissipation, to the intermediate conclusion that thermoregulation provided the pursuit advantage, and finishes with the ultimate main conclusion that physiological cooling capacity was the primary evolutionary catalyst for persistence hunting.
The argument is structured in a clear hierarchical chain: it first presents the premise refuting mechanical efficiency, introduces the supporting premise establishing cooling biology, draws the intermediate deduction that thermal regulation produced the pursuit advantage, and finally establishes the ultimate conclusion that cooling was the fundamental evolutionary catalyst.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Identify the foundational premises that provide raw empirical evidence.
The statement refuting gait efficiency serves as premise 1, and the biological fact about eccrine sweating and cranial cooling serves as premise 2.
These claims do not rely on other statements in the passage; they act as the base supporting evidence.
2
Identify the intermediate deduction that bridges the evidence to the broader evolutionary thesis.
The statement that hominins gained their pursuit advantage through thermoregulation rather than mechanics is the intermediate conclusion.
It follows directly from the combination of premises 1 and 2, but serves to justify the broader evolutionary significance.
3
Identify the overarching main conclusion that the entire argument is structured to establish.
The claim that physiological cooling capacity was the primary evolutionary catalyst for persistence hunting is the main conclusion.
It is the ultimate takeaway of the stimulus and is supported by the intermediate conclusion without being used to support any further claim.

Anahtar Kavram

Deconstructing argument hierarchy by distinguishing premises, subsidiary conclusions, and the overarching main conclusion.
Tahmini Süre:1m 15s
Soru 462Soru →

Anthropologist: Dental calculus from adult human remains at a 3,500-year-old steppe settlement contains beta-lactoglobulin peptides specifically matching horse milk. Because the equine skeletal remains found at the site lack bit wear on their teeth, some researchers hypothesize that these horses were wild animals hunted solely for game meat rather than managed livestock. However, the presence of equine milk proteins in the adult dental plaque conclusively proves that this community had domesticated horses and was practicing pastoral dairying.

Which of the following, if true, most strengthens the anthropologist's argument?

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: The entrapment of detectable concentrations of whey proteins in human dental calculus requires repeated, routine consumption of dairy fluids over many years rather than sporadic ingestion.

Cevap

The finding that detectable whey protein entrapment in human dental calculus requires repeated, routine consumption of dairy fluids over many years rather than sporadic ingestion.
The anthropologist infers that the steppe community domesticated horses and practiced dairying from the presence of horse milk whey proteins in adult human dental calculus, rejecting the skeptic's counterhypothesis that the horses were wild game hunted for meat. The underlying vulnerability is that hunters might have occasionally ingested milk from slaughtered wild nursing mares. Establishing that detectable whey protein entrapment in dental plaque requires repeated, long-term dairy consumption over many years rules out sporadic ingestion from hunted wild game, thereby substantially strengthening the conclusion that the population maintained live domestic herds for ongoing dairy exploitation.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Isolate the argument's core premises and conclusion.
The anthropologist concludes that the community domesticated horses for dairying based on the discovery of equine milk whey proteins in human dental calculus, despite the lack of bit wear on horse teeth.
Clarifying the inferential leap reveals the vulnerability in the author's reasoning.
2
Identify the primary competing hypothesis and underlying assumption.
Skeptics suggest the horses were merely wild game; the anthropologist assumes that finding milk proteins cannot be explained by opportunistically consuming milk from killed wild mares.
To strengthen an argument that attributes physical evidence to a specific behavior, one must rule out alternative mechanisms capable of generating that same evidence.
3
Evaluate the choices to find the statement that eliminates the rival hypothesis.
Demonstrating that whey protein entrapment requires chronic, multi-year dairy ingestion confirms that sporadic consumption from hunted wild carcasses could not have generated the observed dental evidence.
Eliminating the hunting counterexplanation directly supports the conclusion that the horses were managed livestock.

Anahtar Kavram

Strengthening an argument by eliminating a competing causal explanation
Soru 463Soru →

Ethicist: A standard defense of intellectual property rights over software algorithms holds that because creative labor produces economic utility, the creator is entitled to exclusive control over that utility. However, this principle implies that an artisan who discovers a more efficient bodily movement for laying masonry—which undeniably generates economic utility through creative effort—would likewise be entitled to forbid other builders from adopting that posture without permission. Since granting property rights over fundamental human movements would paralyze manual trades and is manifestly untenable, the premise that generating economic utility through creative labor alone justifies exclusive rights must be rejected.

Which of the following most accurately describes the ethicist's method of reasoning?

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: showing that a general principle is untenable by demonstrating that its consistent application leads to an unacceptable consequence

Cevap

showing that a general principle is untenable by demonstrating that its consistent application leads to an unacceptable consequence
The correct response accurately abstracts the ethicist's rhetorical technique. The argument operates via indirect refutation (reductio ad absurdum): it accepts the proposed principle for the sake of argument, demonstrates that applying it consistently to another relevantly similar activity (masonry) leads to an untenable outcome (prohibiting basic bodily movements and paralyzing trades), and concludes that the initial principle must be rejected.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Analyze the structure and target of the argument in the stimulus.
Identified the target claim: the principle that producing economic utility through creative labor entitles one to exclusive property rights.
Method of Reasoning questions require isolating the exact relationship between the premises and the conclusion.
2
Track how the ethicist challenges the target claim.
The ethicist tests the principle by applying it to an identical logical structure in another domain (ergonomic masonry techniques) and shows it would yield exclusive rights over basic bodily movements.
This establishes the intermediate premise demonstrating that the logical extension of the rule produces a paralysis of trades.
3
Identify the overall logical form of the refutation.
The argument employs a classic reductio ad absurdum (indirect proof): because the logical consequence of the principle is absurd/untenable, the initial principle must be false.
Matching this abstract characterization directly reveals the correct structural description.

Anahtar Kavram

Method of Reasoning: Reductio ad Absurdum / Refutation by Absurd Consequence
Tahmini Süre:1m 30s
Soru 464Soru →

Linguist: Some structural grammarians argue that human linguistic syntax is determined strictly by innate neurological architecture rather than communicative function, citing evidence that several complex grammatical conventions do not enhance communicative efficiency. However, this conclusion is unearned. In traditional timber framing, master carpenters developed complex joining techniques that exceed what is strictly necessary for basic structural support, yet these designs emerged entirely in response to practical architectural demands over centuries of building. Thus, the observation that certain syntactic rules appear inefficient does not demonstrate that syntax evolved independently of functional communicative needs.

Which of the following most accurately describes the method of reasoning employed in the linguist's argument?

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: Employing an analogy from another craft to illustrate that non-optimal complexity is compatible with a functional origin

Cevap

Employing an analogy from another craft to illustrate that non-optimal complexity is compatible with a functional origin
The linguist responds to the grammarians' claim by comparing linguistic rules to traditional timber framing joints. By pointing out that timber joints are more elaborate than strictly necessary yet still originated to serve functional needs, the linguist shows that an apparent lack of strict efficiency does not establish a non-functional origin. Therefore, the argument proceeds by using an analogy to undermine the inferential leap made by the opponents.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Analyze the opponent's position and evidence
Opponents claim syntax is non-functional because certain grammatical rules do not maximize communicative efficiency.
Understanding the opposing inference is necessary to see how the author targets it.
2
Identify the author's counter-strategy
The author introduces the domain of traditional timber framing, where structural joints are more elaborate than strictly necessary yet still functional in origin.
Recognizing the parallel domain identifies the technique as analogical reasoning.
3
Determine the structural role of the analogy
The timber framing example demonstrates that non-optimal complexity can still originate from practical demands, thus invalidating the opponents' leap from inefficiency to non-functionality.
Matching the concrete analogy to its abstract logical function isolates the correct description.

Anahtar Kavram

Method of Reasoning via Analogy
Tahmini Süre:1m 15s
Soru 465Soru →

For each of the incomplete arguments below, which corresponding assumption, if established, logically guarantees the truth of its conclusion? Match each argument with its sufficient deductive bridge.

Soldaki öğeye tıklayın, sonra eşleşen sağdaki öğeye tıklayın

Öğeler

Dendrochronologist: Any ancient timber sample that exhibits micro-cellular resin saturation was harvested during an extended drought. The ceiling beams recovered from the Oakhaven manor do not contain annual ring compression patterns. Therefore, none of the Oakhaven ceiling beams exhibit micro-cellular resin saturation.
Bioethicist: Any clinical trial protocol relying on adaptive Bayesian outcome monitoring automatically adjusts dosage allocations without requiring blinded physician intervention. The Lumina trial protocol requires blinded physician intervention. Thus, the Lumina trial protocol cannot be classified as an autonomous experimental design.
Urban Planner: Whenever a municipal transit authority implements demand-responsive micro-transit fleets, it reduces municipal spending on fixed-route arterial maintenance. The city of Riverdale experienced a measurable decline in suburban commuter transit satisfaction following its transit overhaul. Hence, the Riverdale transit overhaul involved implementing demand-responsive micro-transit fleets.

Eşleşmeler

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap

The dendrochronology argument matches the premise linking drought to ring compression patterns; the bioethics argument matches the premise requiring autonomous designs to rely on adaptive Bayesian monitoring; and the urban planning argument matches the premise stating that satisfaction declines entail demand-responsive fleet implementation.
Each paired premise bridges the exact conceptual gap in its respective argument by establishing a universal conditional relationship, making the conclusion deductively inescapable through modus ponens or modus tollens.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Analyze the inferential gap in the dendrochronology argument.
Premises link resin saturation to drought, and note the absence of ring compression. To deduce the absence of resin saturation from the absence of ring compression, we need a conditional bridge from drought to ring compression.
Applying contrapositive logic (no ring compression -> no drought -> no resin saturation) 100% guarantees the conclusion.
2
Analyze the inferential gap in the bioethics argument.
Premises establish that the Lumina protocol does not use adaptive Bayesian monitoring. The conclusion claims Lumina is not an autonomous design.
Connecting 'autonomous design' as a sufficient condition for 'adaptive Bayesian monitoring' allows the contrapositive to deductively yield 'not an autonomous design'.
3
Analyze the inferential gap in the urban planning argument.
Premise notes a decline in suburban commuter satisfaction, and concludes Riverdale implemented demand-responsive fleets.
A sufficient assumption must state that experiencing a satisfaction decline guarantees the implementation of demand-responsive micro-transit fleets.

Anahtar Kavram

Sufficient Assumption and Conditional Deduction
Tahmini Süre:1m 30s
Soru 466Soru →

Paleontologists analyzing the taphonomy of the newly discovered Solnhofen-B strata established several definitive conditions for fossil preservation in the region. A fossil cannot exhibit both complete skeletal articulation and soft tissue preservation. Furthermore, a fossil exhibits complete skeletal articulation only if it was formed in a strictly anoxic environment. Any fossil formed in a strictly anoxic environment was subjected to rapid burial by fine-grained sediment. Such rapid burial invariably introduces microbial inhibitors to the fossilization site. Finally, whenever microbial inhibitors are introduced to a fossilization site, the resulting fossil undergoes pyrite replacement, unless soft tissue preservation is present.

Based on the taphonomic conditions established above, evaluate the truth of the following claim:

Statement: Any fossil in this region that exhibits complete skeletal articulation must have undergone pyrite replacement.

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: True

Cevap

The statement is True. Any fossil with complete skeletal articulation must have undergone pyrite replacement.
The correct answer is True because the stimulus establishes an airtight conditional chain. Complete skeletal articulation guarantees an anoxic environment, which guarantees rapid burial, which guarantees microbial inhibitors. Because complete skeletal articulation also guarantees the absence of soft tissue preservation, the final rule (microbial inhibitors cause pyrite replacement if soft tissue preservation is absent) is triggered, making pyrite replacement a logically necessary outcome.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Analyze the exclusionary rule.
Complete skeletal articulation implies no soft tissue preservation.
To establish the baseline structural attributes of a fossil presenting with complete skeletal articulation.
2
Trace the conditional chain triggered by complete skeletal articulation.
Complete skeletal articulation -> strictly anoxic environment -> rapid burial -> introduction of microbial inhibitors.
To map the necessary environmental consequences of a fossil exhibiting complete skeletal articulation.
3
Evaluate the 'unless' condition in the final premise.
The rule 'microbial inhibitors lead to pyrite replacement unless soft tissue preservation is present' translates formally to: 'If microbial inhibitors are present AND soft tissue preservation is absent, then pyrite replacement occurs.'
To accurately determine the necessary outcome when microbial inhibitors are introduced.
4
Synthesize the deductions.
Since complete skeletal articulation guarantees both the introduction of microbial inhibitors (Step 2) and the absolute absence of soft tissue preservation (Step 1), it definitively guarantees pyrite replacement.
To ultimately prove the concluding statement.

Anahtar Kavram

Formal logic, conditional chaining, and translating 'unless' statements.
Soru 467Soru →

Linguist: The newly developed Babel-X translation model processes textual input without dynamically reweighting token vectors based on surrounding sentence syntax. However, any language model that fails to resolve figurative idioms cannot produce accurate translations of literary prose. Therefore, Babel-X cannot produce accurate translations of literary prose.

The linguist's conclusion follows logically if which one of the following is assumed?

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: Any language model that processes textual input without dynamically reweighting token vectors based on surrounding sentence syntax fails to resolve figurative idioms.

Cevap

The assumption that any language model that processes textual input without dynamically reweighting token vectors based on surrounding sentence syntax fails to resolve figurative idioms.
The stimulus presents two separate premises: Babel-X lacks dynamic token reweighting based on syntax, and any system that fails to resolve figurative idioms cannot produce accurate literary translations. To deductively guarantee the conclusion that Babel-X cannot produce accurate literary translations, we must bridge Babel-X's processing characteristic to the failure of idiom resolution. The statement that any model lacking dynamic token reweighting fails to resolve figurative idioms provides this exact deductive bridge, completing the valid syllogism.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Identify the premises and conclusion in the stimulus
Premise 1: Babel-X lacks dynamic token reweighting. Premise 2: Lacks idiom resolution implies cannot produce accurate literary translations. Conclusion: Babel-X cannot produce accurate literary translations.
Deconstructing the argument reveals the explicit terms and the missing connection.
2
Identify the inferential gap
There is no stated link between lacking dynamic token reweighting and failing to resolve figurative idioms.
A sufficient assumption must provide a 100% deductive link from the premise condition to the antecedent of the final rule.
3
Construct the missing bridge premise
Lacking dynamic token reweighting →\rightarrow Fails to resolve figurative idioms.
Adding this conditional bridge completes the chain: Babel-X →\rightarrow Lacks dynamic token reweighting →\rightarrow Fails to resolve figurative idioms →\rightarrow Cannot produce accurate literary translations.

Anahtar Kavram

Sufficient Assumption Conditional Bridging
Tahmini Süre:1m 15s
Soru 468Soru →

Carefully analyze the four argumentative excerpts presented below, each of which exhibits a distinct logical defect. Which abstract description correctly identifies the primary reasoning flaw in each corresponding argument?

Soldaki öğeye tıklayın, sonra eşleşen sağdaki öğeye tıklayın

Öğeler

Archaeologist: Historians attribute the sudden decline of the coastal settlement either to prolonged regional drought or to devastating naval raids. Recent sediment cores confirm that rainfall levels remained stable throughout that century; therefore, the settlement must have fallen to naval raids.
Marine Biologist: Over the past decade, coastal coral bleaching incidents rose concurrently with the expansion of commercial catamaran tours in the bay. Since the tour boats operate precisely where bleaching occurs, the chemical sunscreen washed from tourists is clearly the primary driver of the coral degradation.
Mechanical Engineer: Every individual fastener, housing bracket, and rotor blade designed for our prototype wind generator is exceptionally lightweight. It follows that the fully assembled generator will be light enough to be transported manually by a single technician.
Environmental Inspector: Standard municipal chromatography assays failed to detect any traces of halogenated solvents in the town's primary aquifer during last month's scheduled safety audit. We can therefore conclude that the aquifer is completely uncontaminated by industrial solvents.

Eşleşmeler

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap

The archaeologist's argument matches the description of treating two alternative explanations as mutually exhaustive; the marine biologist's argument matches concluding causation from spatial and temporal co-occurrence; the mechanical engineer's argument matches assuming a whole possesses a property because its individual parts do; and the environmental inspector's argument matches inferring nonexistence of a condition solely from failure to establish its existence.
Each argument corresponds directly to an established structural flaw in formal logic: the archaeologist limits possibilities to an unjustified binary choice; the marine biologist treats correlation as definitive proof of causation; the engineer commits a part-to-whole error of composition; and the inspector treats non-detection as proof of total absence.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Analyze the structural vulnerability in the archaeologist's argument.
The argument eliminates drought and immediately concludes naval raids must be the cause, which falsely presumes these two possibilities are exhaustive.
Identifying that the premise assumes an unwarranted 'either/or' scenario isolates the false dichotomy flaw.
2
Analyze the causal reasoning in the marine biologist's argument.
The argument concludes that tour boat sunscreen directly caused coral damage based solely on their shared timing and location in the bay.
Isolating the leap from observed correlation to definitive causation matches the classic causal flaw.
3
Analyze the part-to-whole relationship in the engineer's argument.
The argument moves from individual parts being lightweight to the entire assembled machine being lightweight enough for single-person carrying.
This represents the fallacy of composition, where properties of individual elements are improperly attributed to the collective whole.
4
Analyze the epistemic claim in the inspector's argument.
The argument concludes zero contamination exists because routine tests did not find traces.
This confuses the lack of positive detection with definitive proof of complete absence.

Anahtar Kavram

Flaw in the Reasoning: Structural Fallacy Identification
Tahmini Süre:2m 0s
Soru 469Soru →

Consider the following argument by a legal scholar:

'Opponents of introducing autonomous algorithmic sentencing in criminal courts argue that because algorithmic models reflect historical training data, they inevitably perpetuate past judicial biases. However, this objection is fundamentally flawed. While algorithmic models indeed rely on historical data, human judges are influenced by the very same historical precedents along with erratic cognitive biases. Furthermore, algorithmic parameters can be audited and calibrated for parity across demographic groups, whereas the implicit biases of individual human judges cannot be systematically standardized. Therefore, algorithmic sentencing systems have the potential to produce fairer outcomes than human adjudication alone.'

Match each excerpted statement from the scholar's argument with the precise logical role it performs in the reasoning.

Soldaki öğeye tıklayın, sonra eşleşen sağdaki öğeye tıklayın

Öğeler

'Opponents of introducing autonomous algorithmic sentencing in criminal courts argue that because algorithmic models reflect historical training data, they inevitably perpetuate past judicial biases.'
'While algorithmic models indeed rely on historical data, human judges are influenced by the very same historical precedents along with erratic cognitive biases.'
'algorithmic parameters can be audited and calibrated for parity across demographic groups, whereas the implicit biases of individual human judges cannot be systematically standardized.'
'algorithmic sentencing systems have the potential to produce fairer outcomes than human adjudication alone.'

Eşleşmeler

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap

The statement describing opponents' claims matches the characterization of a counterargument being discredited; the statement regarding judicial cognitive bias matches the premise showing a shared limitation; the statement regarding auditability matches the premise establishing an operational advantage; and the statement regarding potential for fairer outcomes matches the main conclusion.
The legal scholar's argument follows a classic refutation-and-comparison structure: it outlines an opposing objection (bias in training data), neutralizes it by showing the current baseline (human judges) suffers from the exact same limitation along with erratic cognitive biases, introduces an affirmative point of superiority (auditability and parity calibration), and concludes that the proposed innovation can achieve fairer overall outcomes.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Locate the primary conclusion and its indicator.
The final sentence ('Therefore, algorithmic sentencing systems have the potential to produce fairer outcomes than human adjudication alone') serves as the ultimate claim of the argument.
Identifying the overall conclusion provides the anchor needed to analyze the structural role of all supporting components.
2
Determine the role of the opening statement.
The opening sentence introduces the opponents' perspective regarding training data bias.
The author introduces this viewpoint to set up a refutation, signaling this with 'However, this objection is fundamentally flawed.'
3
Differentiate between the two supporting premises in the body of the argument.
The comparison showing human judges also rely on historical precedents serves to counter the objection by showing parity of limitation, while the point regarding auditability provides an asymmetric advantage.
Accurately identifying how each premise contributes to defeating the counterargument allows precise matching to their abstract structural roles.

Anahtar Kavram

Deconstructing Argumentative Technique and Structural Roles

Alternatif Yöntem

Isolate discourse markers ('Opponents... argue', 'However', 'While', 'Furthermore', 'Therefore') to map the structural transition from counter-thesis to rebutting premises to final conclusion.
Tahmini Süre:1m 15s
Soru 470Soru →

Match each argument with the supplementary premise that most effectively strengthens its central conclusion.

Soldaki öğeye tıklayın, sonra eşleşen sağdaki öğeye tıklayın

Öğeler

Argument 1: Regional transit authorities recorded a 25% decline in suburban commuter rail usage following the completion of a municipal high-speed broadband network, concluding that improved internet connectivity caused residents to adopt telecommuting.
Argument 2: Sleep clinic subjects exposed to rhythmic acoustic pulses during slow-wave sleep demonstrated significantly higher word-pair recall the following morning than unexposed subjects, prompting researchers to conclude that acoustic stimulation during sleep directly strengthens neural memory consolidation.
Argument 3: Archaeologists excavating an ancient port city uncovered charred millet grains in strata dating to an 8th-century BCE arid crisis, leading them to conclude that the settlement's agriculturalists shifted to drought-tolerant millet to adapt to the drying climate.

Eşleşmeler

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap

Argument 1 matches the premise confirming increased suburban telecommuting following broadband rollout; Argument 2 matches the premise establishing identical sleep architecture and disturbance levels between cohorts; Argument 3 matches the premise verifying local millet cultivation during the drought era.
Each correct pairing provides crucial evidential support tailored to the specific logical vulnerability of the argument: verifying the causal mechanism for Argument 1, controlling for confounding sleep factors in Argument 2, and eliminating external trade origin in Argument 3.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Identify the unstated assumption and potential alternative explanations in Argument 1.
Argument 1 assumes that broadband installation actually led to telecommuting rather than rail ridership dropping due to external economic or transit factors.
Strengthening a causal argument requires providing evidence for the hypothesized link or ruling out competing causes.
2
Identify potential confounding variables in Argument 2.
Argument 2 assumes acoustic pulses directly aided consolidation rather than acting as a buffer against ambient awakening or altering sleep stages.
Strengthening an experimental finding involves controlling for confounding variables and confirming equal baseline conditions.
3
Identify alternative origin hypotheses in Argument 3.
Argument 3 assumes the millet found in storage vessels was cultivated locally to cope with drought rather than imported from elsewhere.
Ruling out the trade import alternative directly validates the claim of local agricultural adaptation.

Anahtar Kavram

Strengthening Logical Arguments
Tahmini Süre:1m 30s
Soru 471Soru →

Ethnomusicologist: Many music theorists argue that musical harmony preferences are primarily cultural conventions learned through exposure. However, recent psychoacoustic experiments demonstrate that the human auditory cortex processes harmonic intervals with integer-ratio frequencies more efficiently than inharmonic intervals. Because neural processing efficiency minimizes metabolic expenditure during sensory perception, biological constraints rather than arbitrary social transmission determine the universal preference for harmonic consonance. Thus, while cultural exposure refines stylistic familiarity, innate neurophysiological mechanisms establish the foundational architecture of musical taste.

Which one of the following most accurately expresses the main point of the ethnomusicologist's argument?

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: Although cultural exposure influences stylistic familiarity, innate neurophysiological mechanisms form the fundamental basis of musical taste.

Cevap

Although cultural exposure influences stylistic familiarity, innate neurophysiological mechanisms form the fundamental basis of musical taste.
The author's ultimate objective is to establish that innate neurophysiology provides the core foundation of musical taste, while conceding a secondary role to cultural familiarity. The correct option accurately synthesizes this main takeaway without omission or unjustified exaggeration.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Analyze the structural components of the stimulus.
Identified the opposing thesis (cultural convention), empirical premise (auditory cortex processing efficiency), intermediate conclusion (biological constraints determine consonance preferences), and the final sentence introduced by 'Thus'.
Deconstructing argument structure separates supporting evidence from the overarching claim.
2
Differentiate the intermediate conclusion from the ultimate conclusion.
The claim that biological constraints determine universal preference for consonance directly supports the broader summary deduction that innate mechanisms establish the foundational architecture of musical taste.
The final conclusion must receive logical support from the entire chain of reasoning without serving solely as evidence for another claim.
3
Match the identified main conclusion to the response options.
The option asserting that innate neurophysiological mechanisms form the fundamental basis of musical taste, while cultural exposure influences familiarity, precisely mirrors the author's final claim.
Accurate paraphrasing preserves both the central claim and the qualifying subordinate clause.

Anahtar Kavram

Identifying Main Conclusion vs. Subsidiary Conclusion
Tahmini Süre:1m 15s
Soru 472Soru →

Marine Biologist: For a coral reef restoration project in shallow tropical waters to succeed over the long term, the surrounding water temperatures must remain consistently below 30 degrees Celsius during summer months. Satellite telemetry records confirm that sea-surface temperatures around the newly established Marabella Reef sanctuary did not exceed 29 degrees Celsius at any point this past summer. Therefore, we can be certain that the Marabella Reef restoration project will achieve long-term success.

The argument's reasoning is most vulnerable to criticism on the grounds that it

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: treats a condition that is required for the long-term success of the project as one that is sufficient to guarantee that success

Cevap

Treats a condition that is required for the long-term success of the project as one that is sufficient to guarantee that success
The biologist establishes that water temperature remaining below 30 degrees Celsius is necessary ('must remain') for long-term project success. However, fulfilling this necessary condition does not guarantee success, because other essential factors could fail. By concluding that success is certain solely because this prerequisite was met, the argument treats a necessary condition as a sufficient condition.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Identify the premises and conclusion of the argument
Premise 1: Long-term success requires summer water temperatures to remain below 30 degrees Celsius. Premise 2: Summer water temperatures did not exceed 29 degrees Celsius. Conclusion: The restoration project will achieve long-term success.
Isolating the structural components of the stimulus clarifies the relationship between the supporting evidence and the final claim.
2
Analyze the conditional logic connecting the premise to the conclusion
Maintaining water temperatures below 30 degrees Celsius is framed as a necessary condition for success (Success → Temperature < 30°C).
The phrase 'for... to succeed... temperatures must remain' indicates necessity, not sufficiency.
3
Evaluate the logical gap between satisfying the necessary condition and guaranteeing the outcome
Satisfying a necessary requirement does not ensure that other necessary factors (such as coral disease prevention or adequate biodiversity) are present to guarantee success.
The conclusion commits the classical formal fallacy of treating a necessary condition as a sufficient one.

Anahtar Kavram

Necessary versus Sufficient Conditions
Soru 473Soru →

Match each of the following actions with the general principle that best justifies or illustrates it: Which principle properly governs each scenario?

Soldaki öğeye tıklayın, sonra eşleşen sağdaki öğeye tıklayın

Öğeler

A journalist refuses to disclose the identity of a confidential informant, contending that informant anonymity is vital for the press to expose institutional wrongdoing.
A physician administers an unapproved experimental medication to a patient only after conventional therapies have proven ineffective and the patient has provided informed consent.
A municipal zoning board rejects a commercial building application because the developer failed to submit a required environmental impact assessment.

Eşleşmeler

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap

The journalist scenario pairs with the source confidentiality principle; the physician scenario pairs with the conditional medical intervention principle; and the municipal zoning denial pairs with the mandatory statutory filing principle.
Each scenario contains specific factual triggers and normative justifications that directly correspond to one distinct rule: press freedom in service of the public interest aligns with source confidentiality; experimental treatments under strict prerequisites align with medical ethics rules; and administrative permit denial aligns with procedural non-compliance mandates.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Analyze the journalist scenario
Identified action as protecting an informant to reveal wrongdoing, which aligns with public interest confidentiality.
Principle application requires isolating the factual justification provided in the scenario.
2
Analyze the medical scenario
Identified two explicit conditions (failed conventional care and informed consent) enabling experimental intervention.
Conditional principles require matching both sufficient triggers and necessary constraints.
3
Analyze the administrative zoning scenario
Identified regulatory non-compliance leading directly to the denial of an official application.
Administrative rules require matching the violation directly to the mandated sanction.

Anahtar Kavram

Principle Identification and Direct Application
Soru 474Soru →

Marine Biologist: Deep-sea bamboo corals incorporate trace elements from surrounding seawater into their calcite skeletons as they grow. Recent chemical analyses of fossilized bamboo coral specimens collected from the Tasmanian Seamounts revealed that specimens dating to the Younger Dryas cooling period contain significantly higher barium-to-calcium ratios than specimens from adjacent warmer epochs. Because elevated barium concentrations in seawater are primarily associated with the upwelling of nutrient-rich, deep polar waters, researchers concluded that a major northward shift in sub-Antarctic deep ocean currents occurred during the Younger Dryas.

Which of the following, if true, most strengthens the marine biologist's argument?

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: Variations in seawater temperature do not significantly alter the ratio at which living bamboo corals incorporate barium relative to calcium from seawater of a given chemical composition.

Cevap

The statement establishing that seawater temperature variations do not significantly alter the ratio at which living bamboo corals incorporate barium relative to calcium from seawater of a given chemical composition.
The conclusion asserts that a northward shift of sub-Antarctic polar waters occurred based on higher barium-to-calcium ratios found in corals from a cold period. A major potential flaw is that the cold water temperatures themselves might have caused the corals to absorb more barium regardless of ambient water chemistry. The correct answer eliminates this alternative explanation by confirming that temperature does not alter barium uptake, ensuring the observed ratio reflects actual changes in water composition.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Analyze the argument's structure, premises, and conclusion.
Premise: Younger Dryas coral fossils have higher barium-to-calcium ratios than corals from warmer epochs. Premise: High seawater barium indicates deep polar water upwelling. Conclusion: A major northward shift in sub-Antarctic deep ocean currents occurred during the Younger Dryas.
Identifying the premises and conclusion clarifies the logical leap between skeletal chemistry and ocean current movement.
2
Identify potential vulnerabilities or unstated assumptions in the reasoning.
The author assumes that the elevated barium-to-calcium ratio in the corals reflects actual higher environmental barium concentrations in the water, rather than a physiological response to the colder temperatures of the Younger Dryas period.
Strengthening questions often require ruling out plausible rival explanations or validating the reliability of a physical proxy.
3
Evaluate the answer choices to identify the statement that best defends the argument against alternative explanations.
The statement confirming that temperature changes do not alter barium uptake ratios eliminates temperature as a confounding cause, thereby strengthening the conclusion that ambient polar water upwelling caused the observed ratio.
Ruling out an alternative hypothesis directly supports the causal attribution made by the researcher.

Anahtar Kavram

Ruling out an alternative cause / validating an empirical proxy
Soru 475Soru →

Consider the following argument by an evolutionary biologist:

"Some ornithologists hypothesize that the elaborate tail plumage of the male quetzal evolved strictly as a consequence of sexual selection driven by female mate preference. However, this hypothesis overlooks a critical aerodynamic constraint. Field observations confirm that elongated tail feathers significantly increase drag during flight, substantially elevating vulnerability to raptorial predators. Because natural selection suppresses traits that diminish survival unless they confer an immediate compensatory survival benefit, male quetzals must derive an anti-predator advantage directly from these feathers. Recent wind-tunnel simulations show that the bifurcated tail produces vortices that stabilize sudden evasive downward dives into dense canopy. Hence, the plumage functioned primarily as an aerodynamic escape mechanism rather than exclusively as an ornamental display."

Match each excerpt from the biologist's argument with the description that most accurately characterizes its structural role in the reasoning.

Soldaki öğeye tıklayın, sonra eşleşen sağdaki öğeye tıklayın

Öğeler

"Elongated tail feathers significantly increase drag during flight, substantially elevating vulnerability to raptorial predators."
"Natural selection suppresses traits that diminish survival unless they confer an immediate compensatory survival benefit."
"Male quetzals must derive an anti-predator advantage directly from these feathers."
"The plumage functioned primarily as an aerodynamic escape mechanism rather than exclusively as an ornamental display."

Eşleşmeler

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap

The statement regarding aerodynamic drag matches the empirical observation supporting an intermediate deduction; the statement regarding natural selection suppressing survival-diminishing traits matches the general theoretical principle; the claim that male quetzals must derive an anti-predator advantage matches the subsidiary conclusion; and the claim that the plumage functioned primarily as an aerodynamic escape mechanism matches the main conclusion.
The correct pairings accurately reflect the logical progression of the argument: the field observation establishes the survival cost (premise), the evolutionary rule dictates that costly traits require offsets (bridging principle), these together prove an anti-predator utility must exist (intermediate conclusion), and the wind-tunnel simulations substantiate the specific mechanism to deliver the primary thesis (main conclusion).

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Analyze the overarching argument structure and identify the main conclusion.
The final sentence beginning with 'Hence' delivers the author's primary judgment: the plumage functioned primarily as an aerodynamic escape mechanism rather than exclusively as an ornamental display.
Identifying the ultimate claim anchors the hierarchical relationship among all other supporting propositions.
2
Distinguish between empirical premises, theoretical principles, and intermediate conclusions.
Field observations of aerodynamic drag provide factual evidence; the rule of natural selection provides a general bridging principle; combining them yields the intermediate deduction that an anti-predator advantage must exist.
Accurately categorizing each functional element prevents confusing supporting premises with sub-conclusions.
3
Map each statement to its exact abstract structural description.
Each premise, principle, intermediate conclusion, and main conclusion corresponds uniquely to its defined role.
Method of reasoning questions require exact matching between concrete textual claims and high-level abstract characterizations.

Anahtar Kavram

Method of Reasoning: Argument Structure and Structural Role Analysis
Tahmini Süre:2m 0s
Soru 476Soru →

Paleoclimatologist: Deep-sea core samples from the subpolar Southern Ocean reveal sediment strata from approximately 430,000 years ago containing concurrent spikes in windborne mineral dust and dense accumulations of fossilized Fragilariopsis diatoms. Because bioavailable iron is a documented limiting nutrient for phytoplankton in these waters, researchers concluded that episodic increases in atmospheric dust deposition directly triggered massive surface diatom blooms during that glacial epoch.

Statement: The researchers' conclusion is strengthened if geochemical analysis demonstrates that during the periods when these strata formed, deep-sea bottom currents were not vigorous enough to laterally transport mineral grains and diatom microfossils from distant shallow shelves into the sampling basin.

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: True

Cevap

True: Ruling out the lateral transport of minerals and microfossils by deep ocean currents eliminates a plausible rival explanation, thereby substantiating the claim that the sediment spike reflects local surface diatom blooms stimulated by atmospheric iron deposition.
The conclusion asserts a specific causal relationship: airborne iron dust triggered local surface diatom blooms. The sediment data is consistent with this hypothesis, but it is also consistent with an alternative scenario in which deep currents aggregated materials from distant regions. Showing that bottom currents could not have transported these materials eliminates this counter-explanation, thereby strengthening the argument's central causal claim.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Identify the argument's premises and central conclusion
Premises: Deep-sea sediment cores exhibit simultaneous peaks in windborne mineral dust and fossilized diatom density, and iron is a limiting nutrient in the region. Conclusion: Episodic airborne iron dust deposition directly caused local surface diatom blooms.
Deconstructing the argument isolates the evidentiary basis from the causal inference.
2
Examine the logical gap and identify potential rival hypotheses
The author assumes that the physical accumulation of dust and fossils at the sampling site accurately reflects local surface productivity rather than post-mortem lateral transport from elsewhere by ocean currents.
Strengtheners frequently operate by eliminating unstated alternative explanations that could account for the observed evidence without the author's proposed cause.
3
Evaluate the logical effect of the proposed statement
Confirming that deep bottom currents were insufficient to transport sediment from distant shelves rules out lateral advection, reinforcing the inference of local in situ biological production.
Eliminating a major competing explanation strengthens the validity of the primary causal conclusion, making the statement logically true.

Anahtar Kavram

Strengthening Causal Inferences by Eliminating Alternative Hypotheses
Tahmini Süre:1m 15s
Soru 477Soru →

An archaeologist analyzes ceramic production methods across ancient regional settlements and constructs the following deductive argument. Which terms correctly fill in the blanks to complete the sufficient assumption that makes the conclusion follow with absolute logical certainty?

Aşağıdaki boşlukları doldurun

Premise 1: Any ceramic vessel containing high scandium concentrations was fired in kilns fueled exclusively by highland tamarack.
Premise 2: Any kiln fueled exclusively by highland tamarack is incapable of reaching temperatures exceeding 900 degrees Celsius.
Conclusion: Therefore, no ceramic vessel containing high scandium concentrations was produced in the lowland coastal workshops.

Sufficient Bridge: The conclusion follows logically if it is assumed that every ceramic vessel produced in the lowland coastal workshops was fired at a temperature
900 degrees Celsius, thereby precluding the use of .
Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap

The argument requires establishing that lowland coastal workshop vessels were fired at temperatures exceeding 900 degrees Celsius, which precludes the use of highland tamarack.
The premises establish that containing high scandium concentrations requires using highland tamarack (Scandium -> Tamarack), which in turn requires firing temperatures at or below 900°C (Tamarack -> <=900°C). By contrapositive, any ceramic fired at a temperature above 900°C cannot have used highland tamarack (>900°C -> Not Tamarack) and therefore cannot contain high scandium concentrations (Not Tamarack -> Not Scandium). Assuming that every vessel produced in lowland coastal workshops was fired above 900°C (precluding highland tamarack) deductively guarantees that no lowland coastal vessel contains high scandium concentrations.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Map the formal conditional relationships in the premises
Premise 1 yields 'Scandium implies Highland Tamarack'. Premise 2 yields 'Highland Tamarack implies Firing Temperature at most 900°C'. Combining these by transitivity yields 'Scandium implies Firing Temperature at most 900°C'.
Establishing the intermediate conditional chain is necessary to identify the scope of what scandium ceramics entail.
2
Take the contrapositive of the combined premises
Contrapositive: 'Firing Temperature exceeding 900°C implies No Highland Tamarack, which implies No Scandium'.
The conclusion claims that vessels from lowland coastal workshops contain no scandium; linking lowland workshops to a temperature above 900°C enables the contrapositive chain.
3
Identify the missing sufficient link to establish the conclusion
Assuming 'Lowland Coastal implies Firing Temperature above 900°C' guarantees that lowland ceramics could not use highland tamarack, thereby deductively guaranteeing that no lowland ceramic contains scandium.
A sufficient assumption must close the inferential gap 100% deductively: Lowland implies >900°C implies Not Highland Tamarack implies Not Scandium.

Anahtar Kavram

Sufficient Assumption via Contrapositive Conditional Linkage
Tahmini Süre:1m 30s
Soru 478Soru →

Match each paradoxical scenario with the underlying factual proposition that most effectively resolves its apparent discrepancy.

Soldaki öğeye tıklayın, sonra eşleşen sağdaki öğeye tıklayın

Öğeler

Despite stringent enforcement of a newly enacted commercial trawling ban designed exclusively to protect the endangered sapphire cod, the annual mortality rate of adult sapphire cod in the protected zone has escalated drastically since the ban took effect.
An international consulting firm reduced its standard workweek from 50 to 40 hours for all analysts without altering its client load or hiring additional staff. Surprisingly, the total number of client deliverables completed on schedule by the firm actually increased.
A municipality recently mandated the use of an advanced, highly durable synthetic compound for all new road construction, anticipating a massive reduction in long-term infrastructure costs. Paradoxically, the city's annual highway maintenance expenditures surged immediately following the mandate.
The percentage of the adult population holding advanced engineering degrees has doubled over the past five years. However, the total number of engineering positions in the economy has remained completely static, yet there has been no increase in unemployment or underemployment among those degree holders.

Eşleşmeler

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap

The correct matches pair each scenario with the specific causal mechanism that resolves its contradiction: the trawling ban matches with the predator explosion; the reduced workweek matches with the decrease in burnout and rework; the durable road compound matches with the expensive sealant requirement; and the engineering degrees match with the wave of retirements.
Each correct pairing effectively reconciles the two seemingly contradictory facts presented in the scenario without disputing either premise. The marine biology match introduces an indirect ecological consequence; the corporate productivity match identifies an offsetting efficiency gain; the public infrastructure match reveals a hidden maintenance requirement; and the labor economics match distinguishes between the total stock of jobs and the flow of available positions.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Analyze the first scenario regarding the protective trawling ban and the sapphire cod.
Identify the core paradox: an action taken to protect a species directly correlated with an increase in that species' mortality.
Understanding the contradiction requires finding a resolution that introduces an offsetting negative effect directly caused by the ban itself.
2
Evaluate the available propositions to find the ecological mechanism.
Select the proposition explaining that the regulation triggered a population explosion of a natural predator.
This bridges both facts: the ban was enacted, but by inadvertently stopping the harvest of a competitor/predator, it caused the cod's mortality rate to rise.
3
Analyze the second scenario regarding the consulting firm's reduced workweek.
Identify the paradox: a 20% reduction in working hours led to an absolute increase in total deliverables completed.
We must find a mechanism showing how fewer hours exponentially increased the quality or efficiency of the remaining time.
4
Evaluate the propositions to find the efficiency explanation.
Select the proposition regarding decreased burnout, absenteeism, and time-consuming revisions.
This shows that the quality of work hours improved so drastically that it more than compensated for the reduction in total hours.
5
Analyze the third scenario regarding the durable road compound.
Identify the paradox: a material implemented to slash maintenance costs resulted in an immediate surge in maintenance expenditures.
The resolution must introduce a new, overriding cost inherently associated with the 'durable' material.
6
Evaluate the propositions to find the cost explanation.
Select the proposition about the expensive, proprietary chemical sealant required every six months.
This provides a new variable that accepts the material is durable (preventing potholes) while perfectly explaining the surge in expenditures.
7
Analyze the fourth scenario regarding the surge in advanced degrees.
Identify the paradox: the supply of qualified workers doubled, total positions stayed static, yet everyone found employment without issue.
We must find a demographic or economic mechanism allowing new entrants to take jobs without the total number of jobs increasing.
8
Evaluate the propositions to find the demographic explanation.
Select the proposition regarding the wave of senior professionals retiring.
Retirements create job openings (flow) without increasing the overall number of positions in the economy (stock), perfectly absorbing the new graduates.

Anahtar Kavram

Resolving apparent discrepancies requires identifying hidden causal mechanisms, indirect side effects, offsetting factors, or understanding the distinction between stock and flow variables.
Soru 479Soru →

Ecologist: Any agricultural system that integrates deep-rooted perennial woody vegetation with livestock grazing significantly reduces nitrate leaching into local aquifers. Moreover, any farming method that significantly reduces nitrate leaching into local aquifers qualifies as an environmentally restorative practice. Therefore, every farm that implements rotational silvopastoral management qualifies as an environmentally restorative practice.

The ecologist's conclusion follows logically if which one of the following is assumed?

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: Every farm that implements rotational silvopastoral management integrates deep-rooted perennial woody vegetation with livestock grazing.

Cevap

Every farm that implements rotational silvopastoral management integrates deep-rooted perennial woody vegetation with livestock grazing.
The argument establishes that integrating deep-rooted perennial woody vegetation with livestock grazing guarantees a reduction in nitrate leaching, which in turn guarantees qualification as an environmentally restorative practice. The conclusion introduces a new subject—farms implementing rotational silvopastoral management—and concludes they qualify as environmentally restorative. The statement that every farm implementing rotational silvopastoral management integrates deep-rooted perennial woody vegetation with livestock grazing provides the precise bridge needed to trigger the conditional chain and make the conclusion follow with 100% deductive certainty.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Diagram the conditional premises provided in the stimulus.
Premise 1: Integrated woody vegetation + grazing -> Reduces nitrate leaching. Premise 2: Reduces nitrate leaching -> Environmentally restorative practice. Combined premise chain: Integrated woody vegetation + grazing -> Environmentally restorative practice.
Establishing the existing deductive chain clarifies what conditions are already proven to guarantee the outcome.
2
Analyze the conclusion to identify the missing concept and inferential gap.
Conclusion: Rotational silvopastoral management -> Environmentally restorative practice. The new subject introduced in the conclusion is 'rotational silvopastoral management'.
A sufficient assumption must provide a 100% deductive bridge connecting the new term in the conclusion to the existing premise chain.
3
Determine the required sufficient assumption to complete the deduction.
The statement 'Rotational silvopastoral management -> Integrated woody vegetation + grazing' completes the chain: Rotational silvopastoral management -> Integrated woody vegetation + grazing -> Reduces nitrate leaching -> Environmentally restorative practice.
Plugging this link into the premises fully guarantees the truth of the conclusion.

Anahtar Kavram

Sufficient Assumption in Conditional Syllogisms
Tahmini Süre:1m 15s
Soru 480Soru →

Ecologist: Marine resource managers often establish artificial reefs constructed from decommissioned steel vessels under the premise that these structures expand regional fish populations by providing new breeding habitats. However, underwater acoustic tracking reveals that the vast majority of fish colonizing these reefs are mature adults that migrated from nearby natural rocky reefs rather than newly bred individuals. Moreover, by concentrating fish in isolated, predictable coordinates, artificial reefs dramatically elevate the catch efficiency of commercial trawlers. Thus, the deployment of such artificial reefs primarily facilitates the exploitation of existing fish stocks rather than augmenting total marine biomass.

Which of the following most accurately expresses the main conclusion of the ecologist's argument?

Cevabı ve açıklamayı göster

Cevap: Deploying decommissioned steel vessels as artificial reefs serves more to ease the capture of current fish populations than to increase overall marine abundance.

Cevap

Deploying decommissioned steel vessels as artificial reefs serves more to ease the capture of current fish populations than to increase overall marine abundance.
The author's ultimate claim is stated in the final sentence: the deployment of artificial reefs primarily facilitates the exploitation of existing fish stocks rather than augmenting total biomass. The preceding sentences supply evidence regarding adult migration and trawler efficiency to establish this point. The correct answer is an accurate paraphrase of this ultimate claim.

Adım Adım Çözüm

1
Analyze the structure of the argument and identify the author's primary stance.
The argument opens with a common belief held by resource managers, presents contradictory empirical evidence (mature adult migration and increased fishing efficiency), and concludes with a definitive judgment signaled by 'Thus'.
Dissecting argument components separates background claims and supporting premises from the author's ultimate thesis.
2
Differentiate between intermediate premises and the main point.
The observation that trawlers experience elevated catch efficiency serves to support the final assertion that these reefs facilitate exploitation rather than biomass growth.
LSAT Main Point questions regularly present supporting evidence as distractor choices to test whether the reader can identify the ultimate deduction.
3
Match the identified main conclusion to the paraphrased option.
The statement expressing that artificial reefs facilitate fish harvesting rather than augmenting overall abundance precisely captures the author's conclusion.
The correct answer to a main conclusion question must accurately reflect the overarching claim without exceeding its scope or stopping at supporting premises.

Anahtar Kavram

Distinguishing the main conclusion from background context, opposing views, and supporting premises in an argument.
Tahmini Süre:1m 20s
ÖncekiSayfa 24 / 34Sonraki
Logical Reasoning Alıştırma Soruları — LSAT — Sayfa 24 | Examkin